PDA

View Full Version : LoR SA Policy Introduced aby GT 06:00:00



kenshin44
06-13-2009, 17:40
Our current nation is 29 mems, compared to closest nation NS 17 mems followed by 14 mems SLOB. Whilst NS holding 3-4 late states, Our nation LoR has become a land farm, and as such we will be introducing a new policy at GT 0400.

The policy is to help SLOB NS and LoR.

Details will be revealed at 0600, as i work on the plan to make it fair as possible both to LoRians and as well as the community.

I won't be given any details out till 0600.

Once it is introduced I will be giving a time period so that everyone can read it and see it and know it, before it takes any effect.

northbabylon
06-13-2009, 22:04
ali, hit me up on msn

MAGGIO
06-13-2009, 22:08
not speaking for anyone and not trying to jump the gun, but isnt it LOR's fault they have as many members as they do.

Dogma
06-13-2009, 22:16
The more members you have, the more SA's your nation takes. Is just nature of the beast.

And I am wondering how will it help SLOB?

kenshin44
06-14-2009, 01:46
LoR SA policy Taking effect GT 20:00:00


Okay so first off i just want to say this policy if you look at it will not be negative towards everyone and will not just benefit LOR.

The policy I am putting up forth will cause an increase in competition and, greater grabs.

LoR as i said is 29 mems, being so big our grabbing as it is is hard, Whilst SLOB and NS do have a fair advantage at grabs, what I am going to propose is going to make Greater grabs for you guys.

So let me get down to the details.

A nation may commit TWO SAS and no more. on One state of LoR

LoR is currently a landfarm and this will not change that, but make it a competition within the nation to get the grabs.

I will give an example, the example nations name will be ABC.

SO ABC state number 1004 attacks LoR state 1005
Another ABC state number 1003 attacks LoR State 1005

That means FOR 36 hours no other ABC state can attack LoR state 1005 for 36 hours. NOW ABC states can attack another state for example as long as no two nation mems from same nation attack that state


Now some of you guys will be saying how the hell do we benefit, well the way you benefit is that the amount of GB on a LoR state will be relatively low as no nations mems can total more than two SAs on a single LoR state, given you Low GB LoR states that can be grabbed, given you enormous amount of land due to limited gb.

How does this benefit us well, it limits us to how much we are actually farmed, and since we do have 29 mems there is enough so that this policy can flow around form enough good grabs and still give us a chance to move up.


now this doesn't take effect ill 20:00:00 and till that time adaptations to this policy maybe made.

But by 20:00:00 we will have a standing policy. just want to setup a policy that is good for us, and i know it may seem like it is one sided, but the policy helps protect LOR states and as we do have many states the states when open to sa will be GREAT GREAT GREAT grabs.

Any questions can be asked. As it may still seem unclear.

Overall i know we are a huge land farm, i just want to cut it down so we aren't farmed that often, I mean log in anytime and you can find a nice LoR grab, i want to make it more competitive and greater land for you guys, while limiting the amount we are attacked.

Divine Intervention
06-14-2009, 02:05
no ploxing of state numbers plz.

kenshin44
06-14-2009, 02:14
not real state numbers :p

Divine Intervention
06-14-2009, 02:41
*makes enough restarts to make them real state numbers*

nosejam
06-14-2009, 03:05
What about when people race for grabs? When the GB runs out and 3 or 4 people from the same nation race for it, what's your stance on that?

Max Logan
06-14-2009, 03:44
Split up in two!

you knew your size will make you a target for more SAs. It`s onlky natural having 1/4 members to recieve 1/4 of all hits.

Sorry, but that`s just true

Divine Intervention
06-14-2009, 03:53
Split up in two!

you knew your size will make you a target for more SAs. It`s onlky natural having 1/4 members to recieve 1/4 of all hits.

Sorry, but that`s just true

you do realize theyre just giving themselves a reason to war if they want to (because i seriously doubt this will last rest of set without being "broken")...like Devil said earlier on in the set...LoR wouldnt war NS/SLOB without a reason....but now that they have this policy, if its broken they have a reason :friends:

but im sure thats just my take and 100% not the real issue behind the matter and if so im sorry :( im sure LoR wont use this as an excuse to war :)

kenshin44
06-14-2009, 04:22
you do realize theyre just giving themselves a reason to war if they want to (because i seriously doubt this will last rest of set without being "broken")...like Devil said earlier on in the set...LoR wouldnt war NS/SLOB without a reason....but now that they have this policy, if its broken they have a reason :friends:

but im sure thats just my take and 100% not the real issue behind the matter and if so im sorry :( im sure LoR wont use this as an excuse to war :)

Funny aren't you this won't be a reason for war. We will be given out warnings when its first broken as players get used to it and then retals. Nothing out of the ordinary. Plus this sin't only on those two nations those are the two taht are biggest but this plan spreads out evenly on every nation...

To max. splitting up the nation at this point would mean no tech/na.

kenshin44
06-14-2009, 04:24
What about when people race for grabs? When the GB runs out and 3 or 4 people from the same nation race for it, what's your stance on that?

if it is a case where 3-4 are racing for GB running out and the sas are spread between a Min or two. then I'm sure we can see that it is no real problem.

Now if it is spread betwen 30 mins or 15-20 mins then its a clear problem. At first just given warnings till people understand then asking for retals.

kenshin44
06-14-2009, 04:42
Split up in two!

you knew your size will make you a target for more SAs. It`s onlky natural having 1/4 members to recieve 1/4 of all hits.

Sorry, but that`s just true

The target of More SAs isn't the problem as much as being totally farmed...

THis policy will make grabs great but restricted to few grabs permitted.


So it will be less grabbing but more premium land.

Raul
06-14-2009, 06:03
Ali

i didnt understood a **** how this policy works lol
i think u just want escuse to kill them all :P

Missionary
06-14-2009, 06:04
though it would be something like this. it will be good for those who get the grabs but pretty much screw everyone else who misses out on the race for the grab.

but maybe nations will deligate who gets the grabs or something like that. does add abit more to grabbing than just goin down the scores list grabbing.

MAGGIO
06-14-2009, 14:10
I guess LOR is entitled to have any type of retal policy they want...it got EURO far didnt it?

Glad I just expand.

Decimus Brutus
06-14-2009, 14:40
This so called policy is utter bs. It is merely an effort to do one of two things; a feeble attempt to justify another war and/or limit the damage to lor states from simple land grabs so they will net better than otherwise would be the case. My guess is it is mainly about justifying another war. Ali told NS he wasn't looking to war us. With this so called policy in place, NS has no choice but to create a situation where lor can "justifiably" break their word yet again.
It has reached the point that lor leaders should save their breath. Whatever spews forth, good or bad, is meaningless. Give it a few days, and lor will figure a way to weasel around their own pronouncements.

With 29 members, what did you expect other than to be targets of numerous SAs?

kenshin44
06-14-2009, 15:17
This so called policy is utter bs. It is merely an effort to do one of two things; a feeble attempt to justify another war and/or limit the damage to lor states from simple land grabs so they will net better than otherwise would be the case. My guess is it is mainly about justifying another war. Ali told NS he wasn't looking to war us. With this so called policy in place, NS has no choice but to create a situation where lor can "justifiably" break their word yet again.
It has reached the point that lor leaders should save their breath. Whatever spews forth, good or bad, is meaningless. Give it a few days, and lor will figure a way to weasel around their own pronouncements.

With 29 members, what did you expect other than to be targets of numerous SAs?

LOL how about you talk to your leader.

Also about 80 percent of your nation already follows this policy unknowingly same with community.

Divine Intervention
06-14-2009, 15:22
im assuming LoR states will continue grabbing others unrestricted :cool:?

kenshin44
06-14-2009, 16:02
SA policy in Effect now.

MAGGIO
06-14-2009, 16:17
im assuming LoR states will continue grabbing others unrestricted :cool:?

funny how that went unanswered ::oops:

Devil
06-14-2009, 16:32
funny how that went unanswered ::oops:

no comment!

Xavior
06-14-2009, 16:59
I fully support Devil.

Dogma
06-14-2009, 17:29
I am not going to tell my members who they can and cannot grab as long as it is a legal grab.

Let the chips fall where they may.

Calvin74
06-14-2009, 17:34
i didn't grab before but i am about to make some lor state my farm land:P

FeaRLezZoN3
06-14-2009, 17:38
lol so LoR can grab anyone any times they want but no one can grab them more than 2 times every 36 hrs, seems a bit unfair doesn't it? it should work both ways IMO

Devil
06-14-2009, 18:07
i didn't grab before but i am about to make some lor state my farm land:P

i'm going to start ke'ing you then maybe ill raze some of your food supplies

Mr President
06-14-2009, 21:53
lol.. Ballsy.. Starting to sound like the US govt and trying to slowly take control of everything :)

I will just simply say, i'll keep my grabs legal to the GAME rules. If you don't want to the be a land farm then don't have such a big nation.. seems pretty simple to me. Cause i sure as hell am not going to follow LoR's law of the land.. :)


But good luck with this new policy of yours.. Seems like the community is really supportive of it.. lmao

Dogma
06-14-2009, 21:58
WE got your back P.

SLOB will abide by established game rules and accepted policies.

Devil
06-14-2009, 22:10
lol.. Ballsy.. Starting to sound like the US govt and trying to slowly take control of everything :)

I will just simply say, i'll keep my grabs legal to the GAME rules. If you don't want to the be a land farm then don't have such a big nation.. seems pretty simple to me. Cause i sure as hell am not going to follow LoR's law of the land.. :)


But good luck with this new policy of yours.. Seems like the community is really supportive of it.. lmao

where does in the rules say you can't double tap top 10 or triple tap people? It doesn't its just become accepted by the community because people feel that its just. We're just trying to admend to it :)

Crimson Shadow
06-14-2009, 22:17
NS will not follow this policy either. We want and plan to remain peaceful, but this policy is ridiculous. As long as NS members grab according to the community standards then we (NS) will not have them punished.

Missionary
06-14-2009, 23:11
NS will not follow this policy either. We want and plan to remain peaceful, but this policy is ridiculous. As long as NS members grab according to the community standards then we (NS) will not have them punished.

Then NS will also die.


WE got your back P.

SLOB will abide by established game rules and accepted policies.

then SLOB will die unless the do something 1st.


LOL how about you talk to your leader.

Also about 80 percent of your nation already follows this policy unknowingly same with community.

then the reson for you to make this policy is to wait for someone to break it so you can justify waring them. uve just 80% prove this theory :P

pull ur fingers out ladies!!!!

Jag
06-14-2009, 23:15
where does in the rules say you can't double tap top 10 or triple tap people? It doesn't its just become accepted by the community because people feel that its just. We're just trying to admend to it :)

True the current no triple tap and no double to top ten was accepted game wide. But you policy is from what I can read only accepted Lor wide. Now if Lor followed the same policy against other nations than maybe I could se an argument and I would most likely agree to it because it does seem like it could work beneficial to everyone.

But until you force you members to do the same as I believe many feel the same way you can take you policy and shove it!

Raul
06-15-2009, 04:01
im assuming LoR states will continue grabbing others unrestricted :cool:?

Of course my friend, Obey or die


I am not going to tell my members who they can and cannot grab as long as it is a legal grab.

Let the chips fall where they may.

And then they come whinning LOR doesnt want to be a peaceful netting nation =(

FeaRLezZoN3
06-15-2009, 10:28
why dont NS and SLOB unite and fight LoR thats the best way for survival, because I know in a few days LoR will strike one of us. We cant keep letting this happen set after set, seriously its pathetic.

FeaRLezZoN3
06-15-2009, 10:38
Then NS will also die.



then SLOB will die unless the do something 1st.



then the reson for you to make this policy is to wait for someone to break it so you can justify waring them. uve just 80% prove this theory :P

pull ur fingers out ladies!!!!

me and missionary don't ever see eye to eye on anything, but man are we in the same page now!:laugh:

Max Logan
06-15-2009, 12:41
why dont NS and SLOB unite and fight LoR thats the best way for survival, because I know in a few days LoR will strike one of us. We cant keep letting this happen set after set, seriously its pathetic.

cuz we don`t want to??

P.S. I just broke the 'policy' 2-3 times. Sorry, but I need land!

Mhaphew
06-15-2009, 13:04
why dont NS and SLOB unite and fight LoR thats the best way for survival, because I know in a few days LoR will strike one of us. We cant keep letting this happen set after set, seriously its pathetic.


So what you are saying is that you think that LoR will strike NS and/or SLOB?

Well....you may be wrong...

Also, why is it so hard to adhere to these new rules that we have set into place are you that stubborn that now you all don't care if we retal against your states?

MAGGIO
06-15-2009, 13:24
if i wanted LOR to diplict the way I play NW, I would join LOR wouldnt I? Still I will just expand and build lol.

FeaRLezZoN3
06-15-2009, 15:52
if i wanted LOR to diplict the way I play NW, I would join LOR wouldnt I? Still I will just expand and build lol.


lol :thumbup:

Raul
06-15-2009, 17:42
lol :thumbup:

whats ur state ingame??

Dogma
06-15-2009, 21:55
So what you are saying is that you think that LoR will strike NS and/or SLOB?

Well....you may be wrong...

Also, why is it so hard to adhere to these new rules that we have set into place are you that stubborn that now you all don't care if we retal against your states?

Go ahead and retal and I will take that as an illegal hit on my nation with the consequences to follow.

Blackwater
06-16-2009, 01:49
let the war beging....

Xavior
06-16-2009, 01:56
Evan says:
okay, so heres the offer
we let you kill Max Logan, then we have a truce until next set
to sweeten the deal, we'll even help you kill him
Ali [LoR] Legion of Riot Coming Back June Set!! Join up. says:
lol
Evan says:
hell, we could kill him for you
Ali [LoR] Legion of Riot Coming Back June Set!! Join up. says:
agreed
heh

Ali [LoR] Legion of Riot Coming Back June Set!! Join up. says:
kick him and kill him
and we end it lol
Evan says:
****, i can't
dont have the privs to kick him
lets hold the war until tomorrow when DOgma can log in and kick him
haha
Ali [LoR] Legion of Riot Coming Back June Set!! Join up. says:
lol
aight

Divine Intervention
06-16-2009, 04:24
LoR declared war on NS and SLOB i hear :o? so did LoR just use this policy as an excuse to get a "ligitimate reason" :P

Max Logan
06-16-2009, 04:46
bah!

::LD::GrimReapr
06-16-2009, 04:49
im assuming LoR states will continue grabbing others unrestricted :cool:?


I havent grabbed unrestricted I expand build almost all the time I havent grabbed many people at all.

Mhaphew
06-16-2009, 05:33
wow slob, some ally's you guys have....

SA Hello(#11)[NS] The White House(#2)[SLOB] 3.063 Land, 308.728 Food 09:25:49-2009/06/16

prestochango
06-16-2009, 08:26
We all saw it coming


I am just pissed/laughing a bit because if I would have woken up on time and not twenty minutes late I would have been able to stonewall.

I looked at when I was killed vs. the GT and it was literally 30seconds from when I died to when i logged on... jesus christ

FeaRLezZoN3
06-16-2009, 08:51
LoR should have been slaughtered while they were warring WLF, but we waited for this something we all knew was coming. Oh well lets just do what we can now, good luck NS and SLOB :)

::LD::GrimReapr
06-16-2009, 08:52
wow slob, some ally's you guys have....

SA Hello(#11)[NS] The White House(#2)[SLOB] 3.063 Land, 308.728 Food 09:25:49-2009/06/16

Thats nice but this one is better thanks for the help NS.

AA slapshock(#72)[LoR] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 3.964.167 Military Units 08:16:37-2009/06/16
SA the Village Hidden in Mist(#44)[NS] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 5.899 Land, 4.485 Food 08:15:26-2009/06/16
AA slapshock(#72)[LoR] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 4.171.391 Military Units 08:15:17-2009/06/16

Max Logan
06-16-2009, 11:07
LoR should have been slaughtered while they were warring WLF, but we waited for this something we all knew was coming. Oh well lets just do what we can now, good luck NS and SLOB :)

cuz we`re not LoR/WLF/AF/Raul?

Max Logan
06-16-2009, 11:08
Thats nice but this one is better thanks for the help NS.

AA slapshock(#72)[LoR] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 3.964.167 Military Units 08:16:37-2009/06/16
SA the Village Hidden in Mist(#44)[NS] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 5.899 Land, 4.485 Food 08:15:26-2009/06/16
AA slapshock(#72)[LoR] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 4.171.391 Military Units 08:15:17-2009/06/16

go Nubs!

Xavior
06-16-2009, 14:38
Thats nice but this one is better thanks for the help NS.

AA slapshock(#72)[LoR] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 3.964.167 Military Units 08:16:37-2009/06/16
SA the Village Hidden in Mist(#44)[NS] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 5.899 Land, 4.485 Food 08:15:26-2009/06/16
AA slapshock(#72)[LoR] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 4.171.391 Military Units 08:15:17-2009/06/16

Thats the stupidest thing I've ever seen. NS isn't even indy, its just a loss of production/turns for them by grabbing SLOB unless they somehow managed a truce with LoR.

Max Logan
06-16-2009, 16:19
Thats the stupidest thing I've ever seen. NS isn't even indy, its just a loss of production/turns for them by grabbing SLOB unless they somehow managed a truce with LoR.

it`s Nubs, he knows better ;)

Raul
06-16-2009, 19:54
We all saw it coming


I am just pissed/laughing a bit because if I would have woken up on time and not twenty minutes late I would have been able to stonewall.

I looked at when I was killed vs. the GT and it was literally 30seconds from when I died to when i logged on... jesus christ

Dont worry, my nation did the FS and i was very drunk in a beach party with lots of girls, i dont know if it was bad not to loggin to warchat or not, what does community say?? lol


cuz we`re not LoR/WLF/AF/Raul?
why me individual =(

Missionary
06-17-2009, 14:12
Thats nice but this one is better thanks for the help NS.

AA slapshock(#72)[LoR] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 3.964.167 Military Units 08:16:37-2009/06/16
SA the Village Hidden in Mist(#44)[NS] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 5.899 Land, 4.485 Food 08:15:26-2009/06/16
AA slapshock(#72)[LoR] Maple Syrup(#68)[SLOB] 4.171.391 Military Units 08:15:17-2009/06/16

thats hillarious lol. there not enough LoR states to get a grab or 2 on? :P

Nubs
06-17-2009, 14:19
Thats the stupidest thing I've ever seen. NS isn't even indy, its just a loss of production/turns for them by grabbing SLOB unless they somehow managed a truce with LoR.

i figured it was better that i get the lands than LoR, even though that estonian took them back from me.. :closedeyes:

SoB
06-17-2009, 14:34
wow slob, some ally's you guys have....

SA Hello(#11)[NS] The White House(#2)[SLOB] 3.063 Land, 308.728 Food 09:25:49-2009/06/16
Look, that was regretable and I felt really bad about it. At the time I was still 20k odd land and Mr P's gb ran out, so I grabbed him, knowing that if I dont, other pricks with low land would grab him to shreds more and when killing him.

Mhaphew
06-17-2009, 16:07
...other pricks with low land would grab him to shreds more and when killing him.

Go into more detail about these other pricks...im curious..

Divine Intervention
06-17-2009, 16:41
nothing wrong with them grabbing the land if they refuelled their turns after instead of using them to build the land. cos in that case, sure their production will go down but then with war it wont really make a difference anymore and plus its more land for LoR to take of the person who grabs when they go for him next. LoRs just upset that they couldnt take that land for themselves :P its not like everyone heres honestly thinking that those SLOB states would ahve been better off with some 8k LoR state grabbing them and getting 8k land and doubling its production rather than the other 2 most land fat states in the game?

Mhaphew
06-17-2009, 17:24
nothing wrong with them grabbing the land if they refuelled their turns after instead of using them to build the land. cos in that case, sure their production will go down but then with war it wont really make a difference anymore and plus its more land for LoR to take of the person who grabs when they go for him next. LoRs just upset that they couldnt take that land for themselves :P its not like everyone heres honestly thinking that those SLOB states would ahve been better off with some 8k LoR state grabbing them and getting 8k land and doubling its production rather than the other 2 most land fat states in the game?

Blah blah blah...you guys hear that?

SoB
06-17-2009, 18:23
Go into more detail about these other pricks...im curious..

LOL, take a wild guess who they are.

Mhaphew
06-17-2009, 18:57
LOL, take a wild guess who they are.

My guessing abilities are shot today, please enlighten me!

Max Logan
06-18-2009, 12:44
Blah blah blah...you guys hear that?

hear what?