PDA

View Full Version : UAAF vs Bank



MarineRecon
06-03-2008, 23:05
domino-harvey(#158)[bank]:

is dead because he failed 3 intels on my member and after i told him to watch doin that because its a respected rule not to do more then 2 failed on somebody he then tried to tell me about how domination isnt like that and theres no rule against it there then told me to watch it...i then took action as i dont like to be threatened

Rassputtin
06-04-2008, 03:30
I guess the bigger man won the arguement

domino.harvey
06-04-2008, 04:54
screw you moder ****er

i hasn't made nothing in your nation, i was just good stock (some 7+B)


but now, you pay for this!

Divine Intervention
06-04-2008, 05:49
i had some one fail like 8 intels on me before he grabbed me. still thinking whether i should have him killed...

Missionary
06-04-2008, 06:46
i had some one fail like 8 intels on me before he grabbed me. still thinking whether i should have him killed...

do it, do it, DO IT!!! wait...wasnt me was it? lol

7bill in the bank? lol :unsure:

Disorder
06-04-2008, 07:46
screw you moder ****er

i hasn't made nothing in your nation, i was just good stock (some 7+B)


but now, you pay for this!


you moder...ummm what is moder?? :huh:

MarineRecon
06-04-2008, 09:16
the way your message came out was you talked to pepl and they said i was wrong about that rule and that i should watch out next time...if thats not what you meant by it then sorry but were not taking threats nicely this set with our policy...plus having a military like this is a lil fishy:

Scouts: 4.691 Level:1
Militia: 91.300 Level:1
M2A2 Bradley AFV: 0 Level:1
F-15C Eagle: 0 Level:1
AMX Fighter Bomber: 0 Level:1
ZU-232 AA Gun: 2.915 Level:1
Visby Class Corvette: 383.953 Level:1

Guy77
06-04-2008, 09:18
=P easy kill tho

MarineRecon
06-04-2008, 09:21
could have been an attempt like hihihi so i either saved some peoples sets from being suicided or just made an enemy ha

Guy77
06-04-2008, 09:29
=P We can war if we want to

leave your friends behind

cause they don't war, and if they don't war, then they ain't no friends of mine

At least you still have me Marine =D

MarineRecon
06-04-2008, 09:31
was that suppose to be some mushy romantic type thing right there cuz it kinda creeped me out hahaha

Guy77
06-04-2008, 09:35
No it means if you made an enemy, i got your back

(Look up Safety Dance, by Men With Hats)

Divine Intervention
06-04-2008, 09:43
the way your message came out was you talked to pepl and they said i was wrong about that rule and that i should watch out next time...if thats not what you meant by it then sorry but were not taking threats nicely this set with our policy...plus having a military like this is a lil fishy:

Scouts: 4.691 Level:1
Militia: 91.300 Level:1
M2A2 Bradley AFV: 0 Level:1
F-15C Eagle: 0 Level:1
AMX Fighter Bomber: 0 Level:1
ZU-232 AA Gun: 2.915 Level:1
Visby Class Corvette: 383.953 Level:1

not really, hes stacking up on ships whilst upgrading infantry. thats what i did as well (although had nearly same # of agm as ships to protect against AR + GA just in case ;))

SkyCat
06-04-2008, 09:47
the way your message came out was you talked to pepl and they said i was wrong about that rule and that i should watch out next time...if thats not what you meant by it then sorry but were not taking threats nicely this set with our policy...plus having a military like this is a lil fishy:

Scouts: 4.691 Level:1
Militia: 91.300 Level:1
M2A2 Bradley AFV: 0 Level:1
F-15C Eagle: 0 Level:1
AMX Fighter Bomber: 0 Level:1
ZU-232 AA Gun: 2.915 Level:1
Visby Class Corvette: 383.953 Level:1

your are *******
he just want to up own net worth to avoid that some 500 land guy grab him

im really sad for all this...

Norrisville
06-04-2008, 11:54
No it means if you made an enemy, i got your back

(Look up Safety Dance, by Men With Hats)

i think jack black did that song in saving silverman :P

we all know UAAF has an aggresive policy.... if their policy is 3 failed intels and you're dead then that's it... looking forward to see more action

pron
06-04-2008, 12:08
Since when is two failed ops the limit? As long as they're not war ops, who cares if they waste their turns trying to op you...

Missionary
06-04-2008, 13:22
not really, hes stacking up on ships whilst upgrading infantry. thats what i did as well (although had nearly same # of agm as ships to protect against AR + GA just in case ;))

huh, AGM + Ships = AR + GA defence?? :confused:

Guy77
06-04-2008, 13:52
He doesn't know what he is talking about missionary, apparentally

and pron, two failed ops is the limit when Marine says it is, lol there is no set "rule" on it, his policy ( i am assuming)

pron
06-04-2008, 14:38
Must be the Euro retal policy that he was talking about in the recruitment thread lol

ranger2112
06-04-2008, 15:16
gonna go do three failed ops on marine...try and kill me :P

Guy77
06-04-2008, 18:34
Ranger, don't start nothing

Won't be nothing

=P Marine may just very well kill you

ranger2112
06-04-2008, 18:40
PFFFFT

huntington91
06-04-2008, 18:44
he wont care to try thats for sure lol

MarineRecon
06-04-2008, 18:56
yeah i dont mind trying but w.e lol idc about the failed 3 intels i just said its a respected rule that u dont do more then 2 failed thats all...he then went on to say theres no rule against it in estonia and gave me sum link that show the differences between their game and ours like i can even read it haha so i said im just lettin u noe here its different and respected to not do more thats all...he then went on to say he talked to some people and i was wrong and that i should watch out...idk if it was meant the way he said it cuz it came off to me as a threat and when i did the intel and saw them ships i acted quickly...mayb he meant to say it differnetly cuz hes estonian but UAAF isnt taking threats like that

Guy77
06-04-2008, 20:36
Nor Should You!

=) Crazy Estos

Divine Intervention
06-04-2008, 22:32
sorry guys, i pretty much visit this place now only when im baked.

Hoebawt
06-04-2008, 23:03
yeah i dont mind trying but w.e lol idc about the failed 3 intels i just said its a respected rule that u dont do more then 2 failed thats all...he then went on to say theres no rule against it in estonia and gave me sum link that show the differences between their game and ours like i can even read it haha so i said im just lettin u noe here its different and respected to not do more thats all...he then went on to say he talked to some people and i was wrong and that i should watch out...idk if it was meant the way he said it cuz it came off to me as a threat and when i did the intel and saw them ships i acted quickly...mayb he meant to say it differnetly cuz hes estonian but UAAF isnt taking threats like that


You can war for w/e reason u want u dont ened to explain anything.. but failed ops :) thats not nice

MarineRecon
06-04-2008, 23:12
im not here to make problems or enemies im just not gonna let my members or myself get threatened lol

Hoebawt
06-04-2008, 23:44
thats fine but since when are intels that much of a threat...

Mr President
06-04-2008, 23:49
basically i go by 3 failed intels. After 3 if you can't get it, MOVE ON!

it is annoying and it does kill your spies. and spies are not cheap.

Disorder
06-05-2008, 00:04
basically i go by 3 failed intels. After 3 if you can't get it, MOVE ON!

it is annoying and it does kill your spies. and spies are not cheap.

What if you can't get it Mr. Pres??? Do you just keep replacing your spies.. or what?

The Legend
06-05-2008, 01:22
Failed spy ops have never bothered me, would rather they fail over and over than hit me with a failed SA...

Norrisville
06-05-2008, 02:14
ive failed with 100% readi, 95%, and then got it with 90% only to find he has twice as many spies as me... the random is way too much in my opinion but thats a discussion for a different thread. why are failed intels so threatening to people? i mean, no offense to marine, its a policy and you gotta draw the line somewhere, but 10 states from the same nation could take your intel and you wouldnt know, but if 1 guy fails twice its a red flag. to me, seeing multiple people from the same nation fail is the red flag. after our fs against tng last set, ihad 10 failed intels by like 4 states.. thats an alarm.

nosejam
06-05-2008, 06:23
An alarm? Pretty sure you started the alarm by having a FS, maybe that's just a biased opinion though... :p

MarineRecon
06-05-2008, 09:26
are u guys like stupid or sumthing...get past the intels i said the intels werent the problem i said the threat was the problem...the only thing i said to him about the intels was its a respected rule not to fail more then 2 then i got threatened...THE THREAT IS WHAT MADE ME KILL HIM

jeff_capes
06-05-2008, 09:34
I get that, :thumbup:

But I do remember something about intels in WoW that if you failed more than 2 in a row then some nations had a retal policy towards it.

Also every nation should be able to handle these situations as they wish so this isn't really in discussion. They took the action they wanted to as a nation. Thats it, If I ran a nation my policy towards spy ops would be the same. :dblthumbup:

MarineRecon
06-05-2008, 09:37
thanks for the support jeff...they arent that big of a deal but when u get threatened and then look at an intel where the state has 300k+ ships u get suspicious and take action b4 sumthing bad happens

Will
06-05-2008, 14:01
Euro retal policy pretty much allows us to use any reason we feel like. One time we hit a tag and our reason was "we were bored" and to us this was entirely acceptable and within the unwritten rules:D

Mr President
06-05-2008, 15:28
What if you can't get it Mr. Pres??? Do you just keep replacing your spies.. or what?

Then you either take a chance and SA or move on to another target.


are u guys like stupid or sumthing...get past the intels i said the intels werent the problem i said the threat was the problem...the only thing i said to him about the intels was its a respected rule not to fail more then 2 then i got threatened...THE THREAT IS WHAT MADE ME KILL HIM

i don't feel i'm stupid.. a little slow sometimes but not stupid. I don't think anyone is really talking about your incident anymore. We know that has been settled, but this is a good place to talk about failed spy ops. :p

Divine Intervention
06-05-2008, 16:24
Euro retal policy pretty much allows us to use any reason we feel like. One time we hit a tag and our reason was "we were bored" and to us this was entirely acceptable and within the unwritten rules:D

where's Euro now?

Besides, "it was our desire" or w/e we had was a much better reason to attack people, am i right ;)?

Will
06-05-2008, 21:22
where's Euro now?

Besides, "it was our desire" or w/e we had was a much better reason to attack people, am i right ;)?

Euro will always be around as long as I'm here.

And no, our reason was basically accepted as justified at the time. Devil disagreed though, since it was him we were hitting (RAW)

Hoebawt
06-05-2008, 21:56
no as there is no EURO Tag there is no euro... :)

Divine Intervention
06-05-2008, 22:12
Hoebs what was our war decl always?

"it was our desire" right?

Will
06-05-2008, 23:02
no as there is no EURO Tag there is no euro... :)

No Euro is as much a mindset or an idea than a tag.

Hoebawt
06-05-2008, 23:23
Euro is nothing and yea anton its Its our Desire... i think boz or cape or Z made it up

domino.harvey
06-06-2008, 10:21
but now, you pay for this!

United American Armed Forces Description
Freedom is the right of all sentient beings
United American Armed Forces Members
Name State Title
Maverick United America(#37) Leader *DEAD*
Jag Strong Conviction(#61) - *DEAD*
Will slateR oruE(#131) Foreign Affairs *DEAD*
dink Red Turn(#147) - *DEAD*
hunter hunter(#165) - *DEAD*
USMC Marine Recon(#175) General *DEAD*
XGC Geezus XGC Geezus(#262) - *DEAD*



:dblthumbup: :dblthumbup: :dblthumbup: ;) :cool: :thumbup: :sneaky: :P :p :beer: :smoke: :wimp: :angel: :angel: :fight:

:knight: :knight: :knight: :knight: :knight: :knight: :knight: :knight:

Divine Intervention
06-06-2008, 10:35
United American Armed Forces Description
Freedom is the right of all sentient beings
United American Armed Forces Members
Name State Title
Maverick United America(#37) Leader *DEAD*
Jag Strong Conviction(#61) - *DEAD*
Will slateR oruE(#131) Foreign Affairs *DEAD*
dink Red Turn(#147) - *DEAD*
hunter hunter(#165) - *DEAD*
USMC Marine Recon(#175) General *DEAD*
XGC Geezus XGC Geezus(#262) - *DEAD*



:dblthumbup: :dblthumbup: :dblthumbup: ;) :cool: :thumbup: :sneaky: :P :p :beer: :smoke: :wimp: :angel: :angel: :fight:

:knight: :knight: :knight: :knight: :knight: :knight: :knight: :knight:

how did you contribute :D?

Guy77
06-06-2008, 11:06
That was rough =P

Sorry UAAF

jeff_capes
06-06-2008, 11:11
That was rough =P

Sorry UAAF

Rough? It was a massacre! lol

Missionary
06-06-2008, 12:05
where's Euro now?

Besides, "it was our desire" or w/e we had was a much better reason to attack people, am i right ;)?

we had loads of better declaration reasons than that. like "the theft of our porn stash" or when they wouldnt return certain non-family friendly items which i would write here lol.

ooga booga
06-06-2008, 17:56
Failed spy ops can start some issues, I know it wasn't the entire reason Marine and UAAF went to war, but it was the initial issue that caused the war (caused him to contact the player, etc.) I had Dboz contact me last set because one of our states had failed spy ops on him 6 times! Thankfully DBoz was understanding, I messaged the offending state and told him that if he fails twice to just try and move on, as I have always gone by fail twice and move on as well. Told Dboz if the guy did it again to let me know, lol. He said thanks he would, and all was fine. :P There wasn't that a great story?