PDA

View Full Version : SPAM!!!



-Z-
11-10-2008, 00:32
Ok, this is a serious proposal.

As the Community grows, we are going to get (hopefully) more and more people posting.

Even without growth, we have had some fools (myself included) make some silly/personal/spamtastic thread lately.

Why not Bring back the Spam section?

We had it when World of War was Big.

What harm can it do?

The way I see it maybe It will allow us more freedom, and less arguments.

Please, Bring back a Spam Section, for those of us who are just silly goofs.

agree/disagree?

harm/benefit?

Z

kitoy
11-10-2008, 01:01
http://inventorspot.com/files/images/1559606_340_1116081430036-spam.jpg

me likes :D

SmarT
11-10-2008, 01:10
here here i favor this!

esco
11-10-2008, 04:13
Agreed

MAGGIO
11-10-2008, 07:37
when i hit "todays posts" and all of it is spam it pisses me off.

-Z-
11-10-2008, 17:02
so lets make a section for spam.


it might not be needed, but it might help a bit,

and what harm can it do?

Exclude the Spam section from todays posts


Z

Dogma
11-10-2008, 17:20
I too favor this action. Less strict modding needed and basically anything goes. so to speak

SmarT
11-10-2008, 17:36
yah anything goes, just leave your brain at the door

Bram Gotink
11-10-2008, 17:45
pro, definetly

BUT : posts shouldn't be shown in today's posts
nor should they add to your post count.

-Z-
11-10-2008, 17:59
pro, definetly

BUT : posts shouldn't be shown in today's posts
nor should they add to your post count.

I agree.

Just like it was when WoW was big, when I joined.


Z

SmarT
11-10-2008, 18:04
I agree.

Just like it was when WoW was big, when I joined.


Z

and then can teh fall of WoW... and now its a MMORPG. i always wondered if dude had the name copy righted, couldnt he SUE WoW?

Crimson Shadow
11-10-2008, 18:41
posts shouldn't be shown in today's posts
nor should they add to your post count.

I would be largely in favor if the Spam section contained these two things.

-Z-
11-10-2008, 19:16
I would be largely in favor if the Spam section contained these two things.

I couldnt see anyone arguing against them.


Z

Satan666
11-11-2008, 16:51
i agree with this too, put a disclaimer at the top saying something around the lines of "this section is not being Moderated, Please post at your own risk."

-Z-
11-13-2008, 23:54
i agree with this too, put a disclaimer at the top saying something around the lines of "this section is not being Moderated, Please post at your own risk."

I'm starting to wonder why we are all being ignored :-(


Maybe I need to Spam to be noticed.


I hope Prez reads this thread, as well as the numerous other threads asking for a spam section by a number of people.

Z

p-kitty
11-14-2008, 00:18
or maybe there could be a "spam chatroom" where you go and spam wif peoplez that are on-line.......

oh wait.... that's called msn =p

but I kid.... spam forum is plausible-ish idea.... =/

Mr President
11-14-2008, 05:48
I'm starting to wonder why we are all being ignored :-(


Maybe I need to Spam to be noticed.


I hope Prez reads this thread, as well as the numerous other threads asking for a spam section by a number of people.

Z


Perhaps there are more important issues that i try to spend my limited time on. Like updates, and fixes and working out deals for members who blatantly "ignore" the rules and post as they wish.

I have noticed this section, but a decision has not been made at this time.. I will let you know when one has been reached..

:)

-Z-
11-14-2008, 22:43
Perhaps there are more important issues that i try to spend my limited time on. Like updates, and fixes and working out deals for members who blatantly "ignore" the rules and post as they wish.

I have noticed this section, but a decision has not been made at this time.. I will let you know when one has been reached..

:)

ok, I can respect that, (indeed -Z- knows what respect is sometimes)

But, it doesnt seem to difficult to me to make a decision about it...

u just say to yourself, :

hm thats a good idea 19/20 community members agree...

And maybe it would solve a few of the stupid problems I face..."

Then u say to yourself "yes I am going to have a spam section"

or "no I will not have a spam section, I dont want any silly stuff of these forums"


Maybe its an issues of not having time to do the work...

O well.

Z

MAGGIO
11-14-2008, 22:51
oh if it were so simple.

you have labor, ligistics, rules, moderation adn on and on and on...

19/20 = 95%. 95% of what, the community? im not so sure you have that type of backing for a spam forum, just a hunch.

Tnova
11-14-2008, 23:03
I am personally a fan of Quality, not Quantity. I certainly remember the days of a Spam forum, and I think people have romanticized the idea somewhat. It wasn't all that great.

-Z-
11-17-2008, 10:51
oh if it were so simple.

you have labor, ligistics, rules, moderation adn on and on and on...

19/20 = 95%. 95% of what, the community? im not so sure you have that type of backing for a spam forum, just a hunch.


19/20 that i have spoken to, and that was just an aprox.


perhaps 17-18/20 is more realistic.

Labor... I would be willing to do it if u knew how, and what do u mean ligistics?, rules are simple in spam, there are none, its spam and no one cares.


Z

-Z-
11-17-2008, 10:58
I am personally a fan of Quality, not Quantity. I certainly remember the days of a Spam forum, and I think people have romanticized the idea somewhat. It wasn't all that great.


I can agree that Quality should in most cases be held high above quantity, however we are talking separate issues

1) real discussion about topics and issues, in which we can all be informed on opinions, speculations, and serious matters.

2) SPAM about jokes, silly games, and wasting time. (we are a game, aiming at fun, and not everything serious I think)


Most forums have some sort of spam section, for kids (like me), and drunks (like ooga, and me), and for freaky weird people who want to just post silly stuff, (like me, and anton)


now...

I do not see what harm it would do...

I just hope that we can agree that it is a sound idea, and should be put back in when we can. maybe in 1 month, maybe in 9 month, but some time.

no?

Z

Max Logan
11-17-2008, 13:35
I can agree that Quality should in most cases be held high above quantity, however we are talking separate issues

1) real discussion about topics and issues, in which we can all be informed on opinions, speculations, and serious matters.

2) SPAM about jokes, silly games, and wasting time. (we are a game, aiming at fun, and not everything serious I think)


Most forums have some sort of spam section, for kids (like me), and drunks (like ooga, and me), and for freaky weird people who want to just post silly stuff, (like me, and anton)


now...

I do not see what harm it would do...

I just hope that we can agree that it is a sound idea, and should be put back in when we can. maybe in 1 month, maybe in 9 month, but some time.

no?

Z

quality>quantity!

and no jokes about my post counts! :angry:

I do agree on point 2) . WHat kind of forum would t be without a Pokemon bashing thread! ;)

-Z-
11-18-2008, 12:59
quality>quantity!

and no jokes about my post counts! :angry:

I do agree on point 2) . WHat kind of forum would t be without a Pokemon bashing thread! ;)


SPAM!


Z

Max Logan
11-19-2008, 04:53
no ****! :p

-Z-
11-21-2008, 14:29
SPAM x 100

!

-Z-
12-09-2008, 19:46
bored = spam.

(why does this count as a post! it really shouldnt)

Z

Dogma
12-09-2008, 19:57
bored = spam.

(why does this count as a post! it really shouldnt)

Z

:spam::

Xavior
12-09-2008, 20:07
/Locked!

Mahdi
12-09-2008, 20:53
/unlocked!

:spam:

Dogma
12-09-2008, 22:27
no body locked it

I was simply stating I was not spamming the thread

Xavior
12-10-2008, 01:34
no body locked it

I was simply stating I was not spamming the thread

We know.


Serious reply:

Does anyone here remember when Svenne shut down the Spam Forum because of that ******bag Belgian? I believe his name was Guy, but you actually replaced the 'u' with an 'a'. The Spam forum was so close to catching the RL forum in posts too! :(

He deleted all of our 'Should we keep the SPAM forum' polls we posted in the Suggestions forum and then Svenne got pissed at us and threatened to perm ban us all! :(

Mahdi
12-10-2008, 02:36
no but i think i do remember hearing about it

Bram Gotink
12-11-2008, 17:21
We know.


Serious reply:

Does anyone here remember when Svenne shut down the Spam Forum because of that ******bag Belgian? I believe his name was Guy, but you actually replaced the 'u' with an 'a'. The Spam forum was so close to catching the RL forum in posts too! :(

He deleted all of our 'Should we keep the SPAM forum' polls we posted in the Suggestions forum and then Svenne got pissed at us and threatened to perm ban us all! :(
where is Guy anyways?

I start wondering if Guy was Guy Verhofstadt ... he vanished as well (our last PM)

Xavior
12-11-2008, 19:14
where is Guy anyways?

I start wondering if Guy was Guy Verhofstadt ... he vanished as well (our last PM)

If he followed our directions carefully, he would have been ran over by a semi and now lies dead in a ditch.

Fangz
12-11-2008, 20:17
hmm, he must have intercepted the directions i was sending to you

Hoebawt
12-11-2008, 20:22
lol at xavior... followed our directions lol thats great... even tho i told him to burn and die in a pit filled wit **** :) or something to that nature

Mahdi
12-11-2008, 20:38
guy as in guy77?

Xavior
12-11-2008, 20:46
guy as in guy77?

Yes, that Guy. ******...

Mahdi
12-11-2008, 20:51
what ever happened to him

Xavior
12-11-2008, 20:54
what ever happened to him

Actually, I don't even remember if that was the Guy. Superguy7 was his name I think... not the RIOT Guy.

Mahdi
12-11-2008, 20:56
oh... anyone know what happened to Guy77?

Bram Gotink
12-12-2008, 02:35
oh... anyone know what happened to Guy77?

nope


He was Belgian?
wtf

Xavior
12-12-2008, 02:37
nope


He was Belgian?
wtf

Guy aka Gay, Bot-user, ******bag mod, etc etc was Belgian.

Bram Gotink
12-12-2008, 02:47
Guy aka Gay, Bot-user, ******bag mod, etc etc was Belgian.

tssssk, tsssk, tssk,
I don't miss him, as a matter of fact ...