apparently only SAMS defend against missile strikes? I guess you learn something new every day. lol
Printable View
apparently only SAMS defend against missile strikes? I guess you learn something new every day. lol
hehe ya...i learned that yesterday too, was kinda fun breaking you guys with 1 missle tho :P
1. Let me start by saying this will be a fun war.
2. I know why LOR is warring us Not sure about UB unless it has to do with the conversation I had with Gildor yesterday. Which he stated it is unacceptable for us to think its ok for a 700k state to be able to hobble states that are defenseless and 15 to 20 times bigger than him while not hoarding a unit. I am sorry for calling you a ball less sack like most in NW.Gildor I was wrong in that.
3. Its a numbers game 20 vs 10 yea blah blah blah we don't have many warrers or people getting involved. Well you aren't the only one we have our inactives or non helpers as well. Just ICN said last set they had people not playing or helping but then suddenly bang there was an extra 600 turns being used by those "inactives" to help. 6000 turns to 3000 turns is a clear difference.
4. we went jets because jets unlike AGM are cheaper money wise on upkeep and also they attack back for SA as I said all set long we weren't looking to war so having jets for air defense seemed perfectly logical.
977 the rogue state doing the attacks on defensless states still gets my approval and every defensless state he hit asked for it. Ill explain why with an example. If your in a prison and you go into the prison shower room with your a-- allready lubed up with vasoline and expect nothing to happen your going to be in for a surprise when Bubba comes up from behind wanting a little something. Just like now playing a war game with out defenses it will be exploited.
We had and have nothing to do with 977 im assuming he is the one that sank genocide attacks into 1 of our states is it his fault our member had no spies no it isnt it was our members fault for not having spies.
Now back to the war at hand even being outnumbered 2-1 I think the war stands at 2 dead for each.
Good luck all and have a nice day.
its almost like you stretch and go out of your way to find some way to disagree with him in some manner.
if he said the sky was blue you would find a way to argue it, maybe its cloudy so its more white, or close to sunrise/sunset so you would argue more orange/yellow.
it was not the best anaology, but as it pertains to the game we all play it makes some sort of sense. he has laid out his beliefs and we all know you dont agree, so either do as he says or WAR him to the ground. its pretty clear to me what you should do.