I'm liking the idea of single tap in the top 10 and outside going to triple tap maybe but no more than a double tap consecutively. SO you can attack 2 times but you have to wait for the third.
Printable View
I'm liking the idea of single tap in the top 10 and outside going to triple tap maybe but no more than a double tap consecutively. SO you can attack 2 times but you have to wait for the third.
Who are the "you guys"? Not all estonians are the same group.
That said, lets continue with the discussion (this is a discussion thread after all) more politely, shall we.
I have some thoughts about the matter why being grabbed x amount of times should not bother you, please review and correct me if you see things differently.
Argument 1 - If I grab you 4 times in a row, then I will grab you again in 36h and take a huge piece of land.
Why I don't agree with this - this hardly ever happens. Yes, it will happen, but like maximum couple of times per set per state. This will not affect the end results by a significant factor. After all, who are the people who grab multiple times in a row? And anyway, even if you are waiting for those grabs to time out, then 1 hour before the grabs would time out, dogma or mrp will grab them anyway and ruin the grab. Them old people, eh?
Argument 2 - Noobs attack multiple times in a row. They don't know why, they just see a victorious sign and they like it. And they continue.
Why I agree with this - experienced players don't attack (usually) more than 2 times anyway. The land you receive gets significantly less anyway. Sure, there have been times (several per set) where adding a 3rd attack still gets you reasonable amount of land.
So what I am trying to say - yes, these two bad things might happen, but outside of top5 they are not a significant factor for the end result of the game.
Inside of top5 they are a problem indeed and they have an effect on the end result of the set.
inside top10 2 in 36hr, outside top10 3 in 36hr.
But this should be the work of UN.
Am telling you it can't work without UN.
If anyone should be the UN, that should be Mr. P
I think we nee to agree on something relatedly simple. I think we should do a limit on top 5 only (makes more sense now) and then a limit for all else.
Z
I think The Helsinki accord has come to the following agreement, as per majority opinion:
Top5 - only 1 SA acceptable per 36 hours.
Top10 - 2 SA acceptable per 36 hours.
Below top10 - 3 SA, but not consecutive.
Z
It seems it has not worked this set most of the time anyway in or out of top5 so maybe just 1 per top 5 in the first weeks is all that is needed and that can be controlled.