LOR vs NS + SLOB

[Xavior]

You realize that you don't need to run multies to be cheating right?

[Xavior]

Took long enough, I can finally get some sleep this set on the count of a good netting set and competition.
Well played Xavior.

May we meet again in better circumstances (I hate cashers).

[kitoy]

i like padding nom nom... ermm pudding

[Nubs]

May we meet again in better circumstances (I hate cashers).

well i hate indies, so that makes us even.

[Raul]

Dont Blame me, I tried to warn everyone in time!! =(

Ali is lieying, he wants everyone dead, dont listen!

You should always be worried for LOR =)

Really funny guy, your just repeating the same stuff youve said, come on, what we need from you is action, your words are powerless, come and do something, stop Evil from inheriting earth! Come and kill me, i repeat, Ill be waiting, BUT DO SOMETHING god **** it =D

Ali

i didnt understood a **** how this policy works
i think u just want escuse to kill them all

Everyone in this game shall Burn in hell

i want every enemy state to burn and die

of course it will happen like last set, Finally someone says something worth of reading =)

of course we are just netting >_>....

anyway, RAGE is merging with LoR next set, so we all know what to do

[Mr President]

Stop complaining already. Everyone knew it will be war. The SA policy didn`t come to protect them, it was a warning.

Unless NS and SLOB get together to kill them, nothing will change. It was in WoW and NW. So stop the complaining BS and go war them.

.. it's all good.. Devil it's nice to be at war with you again.. And even better we are just peons in the nation and not leaders.. Sadly we can't have our 1am leader chats we use to have .. good times.

This should be a good war.. Good luck to both sides.

feel free to submit a cheater report on any state(s) you think our multies, but blinding throwing the "cheater" card out there isn't going to help you in this war and is one of the reasons people leave the game left and right.

It seems everyone knows why people leave the game left and right.. Some feel it's the cheaters, some feels it's the ones who report the cheaters, some feel it's other members, some feel it's the drama and the list goes on and on.. Great lengths have been taken to ensure that anyone who is actually convicted of cheating, has actually cheated.. I have set up a system that rocks!!! Hell even the CIA is asking me how i built it .. (ok yea that was a lie... but just a little one)

The cheating systems i have in place are much greater than the WoW days. I did this so false convictions would come to be a thing of the past. Lots of info is logged so there really is no way to ever get out of things..

A report has been made of your state using bots. Due to this, an investigation has been opened to resolve the situation.

*** Please reply to this message with any explanation you may have. Not replying will be taken as a sign of guilt. ***


. . .they already did! goodluck. . .

As you may or may not know, when a cheater report is sent in, if the admins feel there is sufficiant evidence to look into the claim, an investigation is opened. It's not like we call your parents and your school or your priest, all we do is look at all the logs to either prove or disprove the report made against you.. As soon as a investigation is opened an automatic message is sent to the state the investigation is opened on. I did this cause i felt he/she should have the right to know what is being reported and have the right to defend his/her self.. I have tried to make this as fair and balanced as i can make it so everyone feels like they are getting a fair shake in the deal.. If you haven't cheated then you have nothing to worry about and the investigation will be unfounded and closed. if you have, well then the logs don't lie and it will show.. It's not like the admins just point to a state and say yea i don't like him/her to "poof" they are declared a cheater. I have everything logged to ensure everything is fair and honest..

Ok i'm done rambling now.. Good luck LoR in the War... ha ha i'm a poet and didn't know it..

[pron]

Old farts don't die, we just restart, kill again, get killed, restart, kill again, repeat as necessary.

Don't forget nap time Dogma

Btw--why is it no one complains about LOR declaring on two nations? Seems to me like they could have just declared on one, then a few days later declared on the other. No one mentions that though...jeez, LOR makes it a semi-fair fight and people go ballistic...

[MAGGIO]

i think the complaint in this instance comes from the sudden retal policy followed by a promise of warning and retals if broken suddenly becoming a war against our nations.

[kenshin44]

Did it come from Ali, then it was a lie. Guess what Ali, guess you got me back on you. No more begging me at the beginning of each set not to war you.

I think i came to you for an offer of a NAP, you rejected, then later on in set you told me you were contemplating on warring LoR, and that you will not war us and remain netraul. Then when i put forth SA policy i don't even ask for a retal all i ask for is for you to tell your one guy to try key work try to not do it again. You yourself setup the reason for war.

The SA policy was setup to safeguard our states, as well i knew war probability would go up. The thing was if a nation really really wanted to net it out peace their was that option by following our SA policy. Don't say we warred for ****s and giggles there were two routes, one fight or one just abide by our policy. Which wasn't even that strict.

Also to be fair on that situation when NS refused it we declared on them aswell.

Sure we wanted war, and my men wanted to fight, but if you guys truly wanted to net then could of followed the SA policy, to make certain you netted.

But no you thought we were trying to boss you around or so forth and took a stand, a stand that you and every other player in this game should know that LoR would take up with, we are a war nation, but we were trying to be somewhat mericful to those who just wanted to net. seemed as though everyone wanted to stand by what they want/are so we warred.

I won't lie and say we didnt' want war. the fact of the matter was you cold heartedly and totally refused it, which to me showed that you were ready if it came down to war.

You said yourself it it may come down to war so be it. You knew what you were saying and what you were talking and stood by it, my men wanted war and with your total refusal to our policy it made a reason.

Don't assume that we would of warred you anyways, we were given options to those who wanted pure netting to get it. As for NS being warred well that was a last min decision, when they too refused it. Ask my nation mems/leaders. We thought NS was good to net as they didnt' break policy and we had no problem till public refusal.

We setup harder restrictions sure, but regardless they were just restrictions. We could of gone our old way and easily have warred several days before, and **** over all of you guys. But I thought if you guys wanted true net, that if we set some restrictions you could work around them or with them to attain it. You took a hard stand and we were war ready.

Also Dogma I do believe i haven't broken my word with you. I tried setting a Nap you refused so i don't see a problem. If you think we were forcing war upon you then you are mistaken you could of gone through the measures to avoid war, but you knew waht you were saying when you were talking to me you made it certain that you thought we may go to war as you take a hard stand.

So i see no surprise here.

[Blackwater]

I think i came to you for an offer of a NAP, you rejected, then later on in set you told me you were contemplating on warring LoR, and that you will not war us and remain netraul. Then when i put forth SA policy i don't even ask for a retal all i ask for is for you to tell your one guy to try key work try to not do it again. You yourself setup the reason for war.

The SA policy was setup to safeguard our states, as well i knew war probability would go up. The thing was if a nation really really wanted to net it out peace their was that option by following our SA policy. Don't say we warred for ****s and giggles there were two routes, one fight or one just abide by our policy. Which wasn't even that strict.

Also to be fair on that situation when NS refused it we declared on them aswell.

Sure we wanted war, and my men wanted to fight, but if you guys truly wanted to net then could of followed the SA policy, to make certain you netted.

But no you thought we were trying to boss you around or so forth and took a stand, a stand that you and every other player in this game should know that LoR would take up with, we are a war nation, but we were trying to be somewhat mericful to those who just wanted to net. seemed as though everyone wanted to stand by what they want/are so we warred.

I won't lie and say we didnt' want war. the fact of the matter was you cold heartedly and totally refused it, which to me showed that you were ready if it came down to war.

You said yourself it it may come down to war so be it. You knew what you were saying and what you were talking and stood by it, my men wanted war and with your total refusal to our policy it made a reason.

Don't assume that we would of warred you anyways, we were given options to those who wanted pure netting to get it. As for NS being warred well that was a last min decision, when they too refused it. Ask my nation mems/leaders. We thought NS was good to net as they didnt' break policy and we had no problem till public refusal.

We setup harder restrictions sure, but regardless they were just restrictions. We could of gone our old way and easily have warred several days before, and **** over all of you guys. But I thought if you guys wanted true net, that if we set some restrictions you could work around them or with them to attain it. You took a hard stand and we were war ready.

Also Dogma I do believe i haven't broken my word with you. I tried setting a Nap you refused so i don't see a problem. If you think we were forcing war upon you then you are mistaken you could of gone through the measures to avoid war, but you knew waht you were saying when you were talking to me you made it certain that you thought we may go to war as you take a hard stand.

So i see no surprise here.

This policy of yours is nothing but a bunch of fluff. Your nation accounts for OVER 1/3 of the active players this set. What the fcUk did you expect to happen?!? Of course there will be far fewer grabs, especially good ones due to your member count. Either have two nations or reject members. You brought the issue upon yourself and took it out on the community with your warring. If we had over 1k players like we used to then your policy might have been fun to play around with but not when this game is just hovering above death. You guys ruin this game with your "fun". I'm pretty much close to being done with it any ways.

PS. I'll b sure to suicide your top players for the next few sets...including those nation jumpers...Talking about that coffee guy guy who jumped from SKY. Then I'll probably stop playing. Ta ta