may have been on purpose, but what did he do?Originally Posted by blaa
quick question - if the top 2 state agree to a DNH, do you think that is wrong?
may have been on purpose, but what did he do?
quick question - if the top 2 state agree to a DNH, do you think that is wrong?
Command Sergeant
What did Valdar do? Gave away land on purpose, gave skycat GB on purpose. Shortly - he fed skiku.
First, whats a DNH?
Why would he agree?
First Lieutenant
I'm going to guess DNH = Do Not Hit. But that's just a guess, I'm not sure if that's what Vinny meant or not
Command Sergeant
Yes its ok. Ive been in such situations.
Why did you bring that into this conversation?
so delibratly giving your land to someone else is bad but doing the complete opposite is not? you say you attacked skycat because of what he did to help him gain/keep his land. but yet the top 2 states having a DNH is exactly the same in principle. two people taking it upon themselves to make a deal to keep there land. i see not difference really.
Sergeant
There is a big difference between a top 2 dnh and gb trading. With dnh, at least they got to the top the same way as anyone can. Also, the agreement happens after you get to the top so if you are big enough, you can grab both of them and make the agreement worthless. If you gb trade as you prepare to get to the top, you have to use non-standard attacks to get back at them.
Last edited by kanman; 04-01-2008 at 18:04.
Command Sergeant
Those top players with DNH both get something good out of it... or atleast they think they do.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
