[A] [SOUL] [WLF]x3 [TNG]x7 [LoR]x3 [XF]x2 [TNG] Currently owning in: TNG
joey no one cares what you think - you're a ****ty leader. one of your nation mates got killed by MLM and you do nothing except hope to tag along and share some of Sky/USAs spoils this set.
not to mention that between 4 nations im sure you guys can come up with '19 active experienced' members and then some.
Last edited by Divine Intervention; 01-11-2010 at 12:10.
if we wanted to we cuold have killed them but why when we can have them hit you instead. i know Pino was mad i talked to him, and got him to understand, i do care about my nation mates so zip it, for a person can only bring in peoples for a set or two and then run off to other nations.
except youll find that the people who play with me are the same set in set out for months. and last year i was running nations non stop..and when i wasnt i was pretty much in the same tag for half a year. so i have no clue what youre talking about. the only thing that doesn't last about my nations is their names - but thats because as i said, i enjoy the creativity
oh and "but why when we can have them hit you instead." --> dont you mean:
"but why when we can tag along with 2 other nations and hit you instead?"
honestly i cant rmb last time i was impressed with TNG (except when they had a strong WLF contingent).
fact of matter is: Sky and USA - perfectly legit reasons to attack. heck even Asbestos and WANT wouldnt have been totally out of their place to have done the same thing - they had top states and had something to fear to lose - TNG on the other hand? i have no idea what you guys are doing at this party. id have no problems with u guys hitting us if you had a top3 state or something - but this is clearly a case of you trying to have a share of someone elses glory.
Last edited by Divine Intervention; 01-11-2010 at 12:48.
**** why did no-one tell us the aim of the game was to impress Anton?
There we were just having fun, shame on us
i got nothing against your creativity, but most of the people you have dont stick around with you. alot of people i see in thier, i already know how they are, and then yes that do paly with you alot.
like i said they asked us and we joined, nothing had to with joining two other nations. if we wanted to hit you we could have done it ourselfs, even if we lose, but only few players here wanted to hit SV, but seeing as you had the numbers and threaten other nations we had to join the cuase, i dont care what you think of us, we are not here to impress you nor we care about you or ur nation.
we TNG had better netting sets then of those with wlf days, you can only talk of what you now of so thats your opinion which has nothing to do of TNG's history
k well if its a case of USA asking for help then its a diff matter and correction its not a case of most people not sticking around - its a case of me not recruiting them back again . i enjoy playing with all of them in the same tag but leading large tags set in set out is very time consuming which is why usually ill have the same group play with me set in set out and then every now and again ill do something bigger with my other friends then go back to being small depending on time. perfectly understandable imo.
regarding TNG & WLF - pfft, WLF was made for warring, and thats what they shall do no wonder you didnt have many good netting sets
btw - i think youre reading too much into the "impress" comment. i doubt anyone here is trying to impress anyone
Last edited by Divine Intervention; 01-11-2010 at 13:10.
well alot of the players i see are form other nations who commit thier time to that nation adn others who join you if you are netting only, they dont tend to show up for you for every cause.
we had few really good netting sets, and alot medicore sets, but we also warred qiute few sets, but we still are here
and no i dont kow what you mean by the "impress" comment
i just commented on what you wrote so
and we dont hate, i knwo you have asked to play with but u always come when the sets started, while i had my plans set up the previous set.
Last edited by Shabaz K; 01-11-2010 at 13:30.