implant imidetly
implant imidetly
Nice idea
But won't there be SAMs anymore? I love those units and they are good for passive / defending states.
And bombers defending jets would be weird
Also, maybe there should be some restrictions on the drop-down menu. Eg, attacking air bases with ships would be weird; also killing a state only by ships via land killing would be weird too, ships aren't able to do that kind of things.
But change is good
Also here is another fantastic suggestion (remember the special zones? ) May there be some special units such as King Class Battleships or 007 spies that would be produced randomly (eg randomly 1 for each 1m production) with extra strong specialities? That'd bring some little more action
SRS
wow (2003-2007):
USSR - LOTR - NTN - LoR - WLF
nw:
WLF - USSR - SV - ICN - LoR - SKY - CR
Long Live the Nation
Long Live USSR
NO-NO-NO! pls don't change this game even more better fix this stupid nation menu
btw, Bombers is not weapons of defence
pohjakiht[KIHT]; domination[EE]
I was declared a cheater in Nation-Wars!!! @ welcome to the DARK SIDE
NEVER STOP
LIFT THE BAN ON POSTING STATE NUMBERS IN THE FORUMS
dunno, leaves a lot of space for suicider wannabes.
as now even top state can be suicided by just selecting a certain unit.
might change the gameplay but in the next few sets there`s gonna be some angry people.
CW, TWC/PX, E
USA(x), Deli, DOOM, GRIM/DEAD(x), EURO, SLOB(x), LoR, ABT(x), CR(x), RE
No SAM's would not be removed.. Simply forgot to mention them. They will defend as normal.
Blowing up airbases from ships is weird? why can a ship do costal pounding now, but blowing up airbases is weird? ..
I will talk more about some of the neg stuff mentioned by some when i get home from work tonight. Till then, keep the comments flowing. Even if they are bad ones.. I would still like to hear them..
"You counted on America to be passive... You counted Wrong!"
its not the warring aspect of the game that needs to be changed. its the netting side of the game. very intresting but i think it will only be used as an easier way to kill top states, which is something most people already get peed off with.
Why should top states get special treatment? Are we saying that unless your a top state you don't matter?
This changes the netting side of the game. It now makes it so you can't simply net with Infantry only. You will be forced to protect yourself in all areas.
Why should jets be the only way to kill land?
Why should ships be the only way to lower readiness?
Why should bombers be the only way to blow up buildings?
why why why why why why...
States should be able to attack any part of another state they want too without having to use special attacks or units designed for that attack. I am well aware that this does increase the vulnerability of our top states, but not as much as you think it will. If the top state still has lots of jets and sams and i try to do an Air Attack against his/her buildings, I will still fail. But now, top states have to cover up areas a little more then in the past.
I am not saying this is the answers to all our problems. I am saying this is a new twist that i really like and think would work out well.
Yes warring will be effected the most with this change. It will now mean that you don't have to have breakers and jet heavy states. You will have more balanced states. Right now with so few active members, having states run special units is hard. This way, it's easier to keep a nations networth up as well as balanced states who can attack with anything.
Does the US just send jets in when they attack a nation? No they use all sorts of attacks. So why should we limit ourself?
The only reason Standard Attacks name is changing is cause the new attack (Sea Attack) will have SA.. Amphibious Assault is a weird name to me.. Never did like that ..
Don't feel bad for giving your opinion Ooga.. It's what i asked for. I knew there would be a few who didn't like it or didn't agree with it.. That's cool. It doesn't mean your opinion is less valid..
I planned on setting up a test server for everyone to test out. A change like this really needs a full scale test before it's implemented into the game.
"You counted on America to be passive... You counted Wrong!"
how about an spy op that could steal land?