Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Paper Doll States

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KLL View Post
    do whatever you want. jsut leave me alone. i want to net peacefully. i didn'T sign up to this game to get killed because someone else is bored.

    i feel that i'm netting properly and should be having less than 70% inf.
    you'Re trying the make a rule out of exceptions here mate. i don't know why, nor do i care. my guess at this stage would be, because you can't competite with the top10% of the players.

    if you can break a state twice as large as you, he probably doesn't have GB protection. i doubt any top50 state has that issue.

    well i quite frankly am not aware of any state to which you can apply this. especialy seeig nthat noone except maybe for the #1 has 80 million inf.
    all top10 states i am aware of are somewhat balanced.
    i'm stil lthinking you'Re jsut lookign for some excuse for failing to become a good netter
    Your not understanding. GB has nothing to do with it. I'm referring to WAR! If I'm not stockpiling like a suicider with the intention of hitting you, just meandering along with a balanced state, and my ships can break your ships, or my jets can break your AR defense, then your asking for it. If your helpless you deserve it.

    That beign said I can net just fine. What place are you in? I've been jumping into the 5 and 6 spot at will, so far this set. I don't stay there because I can't LG anyone cause I'im not an infantry *****. So I sell more than I need to sell in order to drop further than I have too. They have balanced a little........ but isn't 73 million infantry and less than a million AA defense close enough to 80 million and none. Perhaps you should re-do your intels or stop talking out of your arse.

    And don't make me say things like "jumping into the 5 and 6 spot" cause I HATE sounding like I'im braggin, because I am not the best in the game and have no room to boast about my netting skill. But at the same time I can net just fine and you questioning it makes me have to say it.

    And when I say what place are you in, I'm not being a smart ***, you could be in second for all I know. But if your notin the top ten then perhaps you shouldnt question my ability.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dogma View Post

    I just don't play that way.And the way they play doesn't guarantee that they will win the set, look at last set as an example.
    See now, Tnova has room to boast, or call others netting ability in to question........

    Quote Originally Posted by Calvin74 View Post
    what kll you didn't know they hand out trophies for almost being good these days
    Im assuming thats a crack at me................When I'm finished reading through all the records you's have broken I'll think of something to respond with.

    Quote Originally Posted by kanman View Post
    Top ten states now will still be top ten states if everyone plays a little bit more balanced. Try netting with heavy infantry one round and see if being balanced is what really keeps you from neeting well.

    Anyways, how are you going to decide who is balanced or not? Just hit whoever you feel like?
    I imagine its going to have to just be about picking either the first nation we see running infantry only, or the nation running the most states infantry only.

    I think the elite netters should try to not run an infantry ***** state and see if they still gots the mad skills..............as far as I know only Tnova can claim to be good enough to run it with a balanced state in a world of infantry *****s. Otherwise if you all could net as well with a balanced state and be protected from suicide.........and be prepared for war....... you would do it. But you don't, because you can't.
    I'd take that beer and talk your ear off, just like I type your eyes out

    VAL~SH~ELE~GRIM

    Total Sets = 10 ~ Suicided On = 2 ~Netting Sets = 2 ~ Warring Sets = 8


    Wins = 0 ~ Top 10 = 1 ~ Top 15 = 1 ~ Top 20 = 0 ~ Top 30 = 2 ~ Top 50 = 2 ~ Top 100 = 4

    KILLS: 9 ~ [KIHT] ~ [DAK]3 ~ [TNG] ~ [PAIN] ~ [ICN]3 ~ [LOR]
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr President View Post
    Who knows, I'm like the drunk relative who wonders around the party with several beers in his hand

  2. #22
    Tnova Guest

    Default

    I see a lot of people throwing my name around with an elite netter tag attached. I appreciate an attempt at kind words, but I'm just a player, not a netter, not a warrior, a player. Not elite, not a veteran, just a regular guy who is really paranoid

    Sure these guys can do it. I started in a time where you COULDN'T do that, and it just carried on through my early stage where every set was a war set for me. There was no peaceful set for me for about a year. I want to make people earn their attacks on me, i want them to look at my state and say a dirty word.

    A lot of people strive for high net to challenge themselves and no one strives for this more then myself. There are more ways then one to get there. I don't understand what there is to argue about, it is in everyones interest to protect their state, why should another person have to talk you into doing it? You think only mean people will get hit? Being nice is no reason to feel like you are exempt from what a lot of other people experience.

    I'm not interesting in being apart of this whole idea Rass has, but I've always been a proponent of balanced states.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tnova View Post
    I see a lot of people throwing my name around with an elite netter tag attached. I appreciate an attempt at kind words, but I'm just a player, not a netter, not a warrior, a player. Not elite, not a veteran, just a regular guy who is really paranoid

    Sure these guys can do it. I started in a time where you COULDN'T do that, and it just carried on through my early stage where every set was a war set for me. There was no peaceful set for me for about a year. I want to make people earn their attacks on me, i want them to look at my state and say a dirty word.

    A lot of people strive for high net to challenge themselves and no one strives for this more then myself. There are more ways then one to get there. I don't understand what there is to argue about, it is in everyones interest to protect their state, why should another person have to talk you into doing it? You think only mean people will get hit? Being nice is no reason to feel like you are exempt from what a lot of other people experience.

    I'm not interesting in being apart of this whole idea Rass has, but I've always been a proponent of balanced states.

    Well Said. I can respect that......................... but i respect you more for not being an infantry slut and still coming out on top.
    I'd take that beer and talk your ear off, just like I type your eyes out

    VAL~SH~ELE~GRIM

    Total Sets = 10 ~ Suicided On = 2 ~Netting Sets = 2 ~ Warring Sets = 8


    Wins = 0 ~ Top 10 = 1 ~ Top 15 = 1 ~ Top 20 = 0 ~ Top 30 = 2 ~ Top 50 = 2 ~ Top 100 = 4

    KILLS: 9 ~ [KIHT] ~ [DAK]3 ~ [TNG] ~ [PAIN] ~ [ICN]3 ~ [LOR]
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr President View Post
    Who knows, I'm like the drunk relative who wonders around the party with several beers in his hand

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Munich, Bavaria, Germany / Leicester, England, UK
    Posts
    749

    Default

    Your not understanding. GB has nothing to do with it. I'm referring to WAR! If I'm not stockpiling like a suicider with the intention of hitting you, just meandering along with a balanced state, and my ships can break your ships, or my jets can break your AR defense, then your asking for it. If your helpless you deserve it.
    well that kind of a nazi mentality isn't it?
    the communsits are doing stuff other than we do, they don't deserve to live, lets go genocide on them. the've been asking for it.


    That beign said I can net just fine. What place are you in?
    16th also droping in and out of top10, with 150+ turns on hand. cashing them all would get me into 3rd place.
    and mind you, this is my first set back after 2 years, missing the first 50-100 turns, starting with plenty of red turns and prolonged absences (3+ days) since the set started

    I don't stay there because I can't LG anyone cause I'im not an infantry *****. So I sell more than I need to sell in order to drop further than I have too. They have balanced a little........ but isn't 73 million infantry and less than a million AA defense close enough to 80 million and none. Perhaps you should re-do your intels or stop talking out of your arse.
    i haven't had a problem breakign anyone yet, eventho i run a state that at least Will accepts as a balanced one and that has been considere d as balanced in WoW. so if you can't break anyone in top10, maybe you're a bit unbalanced, if my balanced state has been able to break larger states in top20.
    also, i don't do intels, nor do i need to as most of top10 are in my nations.
    But if your notin the top ten then perhaps you shouldnt question my ability.
    i can consider myself qualified then, eventho i don't see myself as the netting elite, but just a somewhat sucessfull vet.
    Last edited by KLL; 06-12-2008 at 05:24.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,101

    Default

    HAIL RASSPUTTIN HAIL RASSPUTTIN HAIL RASSPUTTIN
    [GRIM]x16[THIK]x2[SC][LOR]

    YOU BRING THE RIFLES ILL SUPPLY THE NAPALM
    You should fear my inability to finish number one!
    I will be pissing in Cheerios and Pooping in Oatmeal again next set!!

    ***Puffs out chest, cracks knuckles, bombers locked and loaded!

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grim Digital View Post
    As a new player, I have observed top states that can not be land grabbed. But can be burnt like a paper doll. They are vulnerable to an act of war. Why should I finish between 50 & 100 ready for war, and not take out a top ten who isn't? As a new player you should fear my inability to finish first.

    What would happen if everyone from rank 100 - 200 took out the top 25? How many that can't be land grabbed could easily be killed. How could you retaliate against those numbers? And if so, is it suicide?

    What if i Posted your intel regularly with the sole purpose of inviting suiciders?

    Would I then be forcing you to play only one way.................................
    well i think i am in love with your idea nothing wrong with not being in top 25 when you can have fun

    SV

Similar Threads

  1. Bot States
    By Mr President in forum Admin Announcements (News)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-14-2019, 18:48
  2. States
    By Whilston in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-27-2014, 12:13
  3. Research Paper (Campaign Finance Reform)
    By BeeNo in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-16-2011, 20:42
  4. Why don the 2-9 states..
    By Vivid in forum Redemption Server Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-23-2008, 03:45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •