AA then grab is this ok?

[Vivid]

Is it ok to AA somebody with a higher networth then take land?

I mean what good are ships if we can't use them?

[swede7]

It works as a strategy but you and your nation would probably get killed by the nation you do it to because they won't like it.

[k959]

ya aa + sa = bad things

[huntington91]

Is it ok to AA somebody with a higher networth then take land?

I mean what good are ships if we can't use them?

if you do it, make sure it is a state with no nation
ships=networth

[Vivid]

The game would be better if we could use AA to help with land grabs.

I'm not talking about AA to 0 but just a couple, few times, in order to secure a land grab.

[Rassputtin]

The game would be better if we could use AA to help with land grabs.

I'm not talking about AA to 0 but just a couple, few times, in order to secure a land grab.

You can do it. It's not against any game rules. The problem is the consequences. You have to consider the result of using a war attack, in this case an AA that will kill millions of units, to lower readiness enough so that you can attack again kill more units and steal land.

Obviously its a fine thing to do if you're prepared to accept the retaliation.

[Xavior]

Hey Rass, remember our AAs on [RO] when we played in Valhala with GK?

[Grendel Khan]

AAs just get bad press.

[::LD::GrimReapr]

Its one of those gentleman rules that gets enforced by the gentlemen at the top.

[jameswheel]

Is it ok to AA somebody with a higher networth then take land?

I mean what good are ships if we can't use them?

Same Vivid as played before? Sounds like a similiar attitude.