Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: A little odd KIHT?

  1. #1

    Default A little odd KIHT?

    Antioch(#)[HORDE] MarioP(#)[KIHT] 554 Land, 1 Science, $528.061.040, 26.849 Food 01:10:17-2008/06/23
    SA Alchemy(#)[KIHT] MarioP(#) 121 Land, 1 Science, $4.975.814, 27.120 Food 10:12:34-2008/06/22
    SA Alchemy(#)[KIHT] MarioP(#) 174 Land, 1 Science, $5.129.705, 27.394 Food 10:12:21-2008/06/22
    SA Rhino(#)[LoR] MarioP(#)[KIHT] 1.422 Land, 1 Science, $5.288.356, 27.670 Food 10:08:42-2008/06/22


    That was a little strange?? Drop tag then got hit, then joined again,
    Didn't get the land expected though,

    Not sure if this is the right section for this either.
    Last edited by jeff_capes; 06-23-2008 at 09:25.
    Old Nations: [AF]x4 [E]x3 [Royals]x3 [BA3] [WLF]x4 [TNG] [TNWF] [LOL] [EE] [HORDE] [DAK] [HAJ] [BH]x2 [EURO][TNR][PAIN][CB][US][UB]x2[SKY]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lower Alabama
    Posts
    2,664

    Default

    That is a classic example of land farming

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dogma View Post
    That is a classic example of land farming
    i thought this is a case of Margus giving the other guy GB protection...

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  4. #4

    Default

    Looks like they seen the 1.422 lost on the last attack and thought if i'm going to lose land might as well be to a friend. If you look he dropped tag only 2 or 3 minutes after that big grab.
    But didn't work out that way as he SA'd him twice and got less than 400 land. but if it can be done why not?
    Old Nations: [AF]x4 [E]x3 [Royals]x3 [BA3] [WLF]x4 [TNG] [TNWF] [LOL] [EE] [HORDE] [DAK] [HAJ] [BH]x2 [EURO][TNR][PAIN][CB][US][UB]x2[SKY]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lower Alabama
    Posts
    2,664

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OneMoreTime View Post
    i thought this is a case of Margus giving the other guy GB protection...
    Another benefit of landfarming

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    567

    Default

    we should implement the use of amphibious assaults as part of a normal strike to gain land, states should start defending all areas since the beggining of the game, it will make the game much funnier, i dont know why the hell we cant AA as preparation for a normal SA >_>, its so weak
    The Flying Circus

    [MexUn]x7 [AF]x12 [RFC]x1 [LOR]x1 [WANT]x2 [LOR]x1 [AF]x4 [SMILE]x1 [WLF]x1 [LOR]x1 [AF]x2 [RAGE]x2
    [LOR]x2 [USA]x1 [TNG]x1 [WLF]x1 [ICN]x1 [WLF]x1 [DEAD]x1
    [LOR 2018]

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,658

    Default

    I remember before when this type of playing would cause the states in question to be deleted.

    We've come a long way....
    Quote Originally Posted by Tnova
    Hmmmm, well, I was speaking on a person to person basis, since you are one of my favorite people in the game.
    - Lost and Desolated -



    WoW | [CW][E][ELE][FW][TNR][Dak][FED][SSC][xPJx][HuuF][LoR][TWC][PX][Horde][EURO][Royals][TE][USA][ExELDx][SH][VAL]
    NW | [USA][GRIM][DEAD][ABT][SLOB][AIUR][LoR][TG][xELDx][TEEF][UFS][bro][FEDx][XF][ICN][LoUB][TE][GIAA][Hades][Pasta][GGG]


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lower Alabama
    Posts
    2,664

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xavior View Post
    I remember before when this type of playing would cause the states in question to be deleted.

    We've come a long way....
    Must say I remember those days, but, I think if they did it now they would get a similar ending to their set.

    Just wouldn't be Mr P doing the deleting.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,101

    Default

    I think all forms of attack should be able to be used for land grabbing which ever will help you get the most bang for your buck.
    [GRIM]x16[THIK]x2[SC][LOR]

    YOU BRING THE RIFLES ILL SUPPLY THE NAPALM
    You should fear my inability to finish number one!
    I will be pissing in Cheerios and Pooping in Oatmeal again next set!!

    ***Puffs out chest, cracks knuckles, bombers locked and loaded!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    717

    Default

    All attacks can be used. You just have to live with the consequences.
    I'd take that beer and talk your ear off, just like I type your eyes out

    VAL~SH~ELE~GRIM

    Total Sets = 10 ~ Suicided On = 2 ~Netting Sets = 2 ~ Warring Sets = 8


    Wins = 0 ~ Top 10 = 1 ~ Top 15 = 1 ~ Top 20 = 0 ~ Top 30 = 2 ~ Top 50 = 2 ~ Top 100 = 4

    KILLS: 9 ~ [KIHT] ~ [DAK]3 ~ [TNG] ~ [PAIN] ~ [ICN]3 ~ [LOR]
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr President View Post
    Who knows, I'm like the drunk relative who wonders around the party with several beers in his hand

Similar Threads

  1. kiht declares war on LOL
    By evilnoob in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 154
    Last Post: 04-06-2008, 13:30
  2. KIHT declares war on USA & WANT
    By Rassputtin in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 04-05-2008, 14:38
  3. Respect to [Kiht] States
    By -Z- in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-04-2008, 18:31
  4. KiHt vs USA
    By -Z- in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-03-2008, 11:25
  5. LOL vs KIHT innimient?
    By CommunistCapitalism in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-31-2008, 06:23

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •