FA of the USA!

[kanman]

I said the rules were informal...what are you trying to say?

[::LD::GrimReapr]

I believe i said whats good for the goose is good for the gander so now we get to change rules cause the top 10 deems it ok.But yet you were all opposed and upset at the idea of THIK last set you guys make me laugh.
I am not currently in the top 10 and the way it looks most of the top 30 are infantry hoarding and cant be grabbed by anyone building a balanced state.
So i leave you with this i am goin to make a rule change for myself if i can which im sure i will be able to at 1 point or other i will start AA'ing hoarders just enough to grab land i dont care if it brings death down upon me infact maybe ill change the rules for myself even more to do what i can to make sure the state i AA dies or loses a ****load in networth to rectify the hoarding situation again. cause to be honest with you this **** is what makes me wanna quit the game not the warring or even dying cause of war and then having your restart killed.Its the hoarding of infantry to be ungrabbable to anyone not hoarding infantry you guys ***** about rule changes well guess what we need something cause i can see my future in this game not lasting much longer because i wont conform to hoarding i think it's gay and i believe that if you hoard infantry and someone needs to AA your *** to grabb you then it should be perfectly legal to do so cause there aint no rules in war.But again the people in the top 10 make the rules as we see by the **** goin on in top 10 now.
So let this be a warning i cant get all of you but i will get 1 of you if you find me and kill me first fine whatever all i ask is that you let the nation i sit in out of my current threat because they have nothing to do with this and know nothing about what i am currently typing here.

Cant wait to see what some of you arrogant ****s have to say about this.

[CommunistCapitalism]

i've been mostly quiet about this, but if you haven't noticed, i'm the other culprit along with Z, but i think strategy is not something that should be punished for. This topic should now be locked.

[Mr President]

I believe i said whats good for the goose is good for the gander so now we get to change rules cause the top 10 deems it ok.But yet you were all opposed and upset at the idea of THIK last set you guys make me laugh.
I am not currently in the top 10 and the way it looks most of the top 30 are infantry hoarding and cant be grabbed by anyone building a balanced state.
So i leave you with this i am goin to make a rule change for myself if i can which im sure i will be able to at 1 point or other i will start AA'ing hoarders just enough to grab land i dont care if it brings death down upon me infact maybe ill change the rules for myself even more to do what i can to make sure the state i AA dies or loses a ****load in networth to rectify the hoarding situation again. cause to be honest with you this **** is what makes me wanna quit the game not the warring or even dying cause of war and then having your restart killed.Its the hoarding of infantry to be ungrabbable to anyone not hoarding infantry you guys ***** about rule changes well guess what we need something cause i can see my future in this game not lasting much longer because i wont conform to hoarding i think it's gay and i believe that if you hoard infantry and someone needs to AA your *** to grabb you then it should be perfectly legal to do so cause there aint no rules in war.But again the people in the top 10 make the rules as we see by the **** goin on in top 10 now.
So let this be a warning i cant get all of you but i will get 1 of you if you find me and kill me first fine whatever all i ask is that you let the nation i sit in out of my current threat because they have nothing to do with this and know nothing about what i am currently typing here.

Cant wait to see what some of you arrogant ****s have to say about this.

First, as a dev team member you shouldn't be saying things like your time here won't be much longer. Dev team members are the front lines to making the game better. And honestly, i think only members who love this game and has it's best interest at heart should be dev team people.

Infantry horders is the way "some" people play. If they want to take the chance at being light in other areas then that is there right to do so.

I'm in the top 10 (which never happens) but i don't have all infantry either.
I'm not a fan of that. I like to be war ready at a moments notice.

I don't see where the top 10 is making any rules here. In fact, it's only 2 states who made an agreement. And they made that to prove a point. Any other member who is not ranked 1 or 2 should really not have anything to say about this. Z and communist are only proving a point to the top 1 & 2 states.

Cant wait to see what some of you arrogant ****s have to say about this.

I hope my reply wasn't to arrogant

[Disorder]

And..... he's being paid to think like that.... nice.

[::LD::GrimReapr]

First, as a dev team member you shouldn't be saying things like your time here won't be much longer. Dev team members are the front lines to making the game better. And honestly, i think only members who love this game and has it's best interest at heart should be dev team people.

Ok, maybe my post was a bit harsh so for that i am sorry and as a devolopment team member i am trying to make the game better by inserting my 2 cents on things people are posting about to make the game better.

Infantry horders is the way "some" people play. If they want to take the chance at being light in other areas then that is there right to do so.

But yet if i AA someone to grab em because they are infantry hoarding it will get me killed.If I attack that state other than SA to Grab them that is an act of war and will also get me killed as a devolopment team member then i will post something in the devolopment section on what can be done to grab someone that is infantry hoarding that wont get you killed.

I'm in the top 10 (which never happens) but i don't have all infantry either.
I'm not a fan of that. I like to be war ready at a moments notice .

I didnt say everyone was hoarding i said almost everyone.
So how do you grab someone thats got 3-4 sometimes 5 or 6 times your inf and nothing else or very little of it to make a difference without starting a war.

I don't see where the top 10 is making any rules here. In fact, it's only 2 states who made an agreement. And they made that to prove a point. Any other member who is not ranked 1 or 2 should really not have anything to say about this. Z and communist are only proving a point to the top 1 & 2 states.

But if everyone paired off and did the same thing nobody would be grabbing land for GB would be outrageuos and we would all sit there and expand till we turned blue in the face and got no where.Even though it was the top 2 people in the game why wouldnt it affect anyone else below them that could possibly grab them i fail to see why nobody else should have a say in this just because its the top 2 people doesnt mean it dont affect everyone.

Rass tried making a statement last set about infantry hoarding and was just about crucified for it and that was 1 person others followed because they are tired of the hoarding too.As for my statement about my time being short here it has nothing to do with the people in this game for you are all great people but the way some of the game is played or how its being played with some of the rules in effect make it frustrating because as stated above the only thing you can do about it will start a war.

I hope my reply wasn't to arrogant

No it wasnt arrogant at all but i think i have the right to voice my opinion maybe not as i did but thats what it usually takes to get peoples attention.
You are trying to get more people to play this game and i myself have invited 4-5 of my friends from an online gaming clan that i have been apart of for 9 years.I am a kid at heart and love to play games but i feel at this time the only way to compete with everyone else in this game is to hoard infantry and its just not my style. I would love to see new units and abilities in the game that would make it more interesting.I dont know your schedule MR.P and I currently appreciate everything you do for this game because i like the game alot.But i think untill new things are put into place the new people you get like myself will find it frustrating and after a few sets less likely to spend as much time as (I/WE) would if things were a little different.

[Missionary]

I'm in the top 10 (which never happens) but i don't have all infantry either.
I'm not a fan of that. I like to be war ready at a moments notice.

theres 2 of you in the top 10

@ grim - there are other ways to get to the top without hording. it takes alot more skill than what most of the members do now aa days but it is possible and easily done if you know how and have the time.

[Dogma]

Well, it justlooks to me like Foreign Affairs in action. These two states have worked out something among themselves, Their nations are ok with their deal. mainly when a retal happenes in top ten it is because that the offended state wants it. In this instance, neither of the two states are offended by the actions of the other. They are the only ones involved in this, I just don't see what everyone else is so worried about. I mean, Kanman made a deal with his friend, Z made a deal with his friend. So, the deals are different, but, so what? A deal is a deal, and anyone is allowed to make ay sort of deal they want in this game in order to accomplish their own goals. Sorry others don't like it, but hey, if you were in their position, you would want to try and help yourself achieve your own goals.


Now, I am not in the top ten, and I don't have a dog in this hunt either, but I am only wondering why it is anyone elses business what happens within another nation. Just doesn't make sense to me. Are we now saying that someone should have a say in what happens on someone elses nations?

[Norrisville]

theres 2 of you in the top 10

@ grim - there are other ways to get to the top without hording. it takes alot more skill than what most of the members do now aa days but it is possible and easily done if you know how and have the time.

notice the typo. if thats not a subliminal message idk what is...

Pres I understand where Grim's coming from, he just delivered too harshly.
but grim, doing a million AA's wont change the way people play. they will keep killing you until you stop. and if you do make a nation, your whle nation will be killed until you all stop. it's a shame people play that way, but they do, and you gotta live with it. find another reason to start a war and youll have yourself a bunch of easy kills.

[Dogma]

SA HOLLANDwarriors(#)[LoR] John(#) 124 Land, 2.856 Science, $996.469, 1.261 Food 04:19:28-2008/08/12
SA HOLLANDwarriors(#)[LoR] John(#) 174 Land, 2.885 Science, $1.027.287, 1.274 Food 04:19:22-2008/08/12
SA HOLLANDwarriors(#)[LoR] John(#) 267 Land, 2.914 Science, $1.059.059, 1.287 Food 04:19:15-2008/08/12
SA HOLLANDwarriors(#)[LoR] John(#) 476 Land, 2.943 Science, $1.091.814, 1.300 Food 04:19:10-2008/08/12


How come this is continually happening and no one says a thing? Is this not the same type of breaking of the unwritten rules as well? Why is it different that only complaints happen if it is a top state? Or is this a different degree of wrong? Is Feeding now an accepted tactic? Guess it must be.