WLF=WTF the L switched with a T.

[Soviet Russia]

I was planning to do that

[pron]

We claim kill rights because we declared on him first this set for killing noobs and he declared on us when we had 2 other nations warring us.

[Soviet Russia]

We claim kill rights because we declared on him first this set for killing noobs and he declared on us when we had 2 other nations warring us.

I was in LoR when LoR declared, so I think I also have a share of the rights

[Mhaphew]

I was in LoR when LoR declared, so I think I also have a share of the rights

you got your share, you killed him at least 1x.

[ooga booga]

We claim kill rights because we declared on him first this set for killing noobs and he declared on us when we had 2 other nations warring us.

And all he could muster up where what, 7 failed AR's on your worst state and then he gave up? We burned down LoR's front gates and he still just sat at the entrance throwing pebbles at the crumbled walls...

[pron]

And all he could muster up where what, 7 failed AR's on your worst state and then he gave up? We burned down LoR's front gates and he still just sat at the entrance throwing pebbles at the crumbled walls...

I agree . He didn't put up much of a fight against us, however, its the principal of the thing

[-Z-]

Why would you want to kill a noob?

I repeat myself: This games purpose is not warring, this games purpose is gaining the biggest networth.

Listen to Blaa, his name is full of virtue and he knows what he is talking about.

This is a game of peaceful networth gaining. the purpose has little to do with war, otherwise the name of the game would probably involve war wouldn't it?

There are no war attacks in this game, nations compete for rank alone peacefully.

most of the threads on the forums here are about peace and love and gaining Networth. none have anything to do with war, or hostile actions.

This game is for hippies and economists, not for those seeking to have fun.

Listen to blaa, he is the man.

Z

[Calvin74]

Listen to Blaa, his name is full of virtue and he knows what he is talking about.

This is a game of peaceful networth gaining. the purpose has little to do with war, otherwise the name of the game would probably involve war wouldn't it?

There are no war attacks in this game, nations compete for rank alone peacefully.

most of the threads on the forums here are about peace and love and gaining Networth. none have anything to do with war, or hostile actions.

This game is for hippies and economists, not for those seeking to have fun.

Listen to blaa, he is the man.

Z

you say that yet at the same time this game is won by the person with the highest nw. most of the measurable statistics concern how much net you gain not how much you destroy. more people remember the great netters instead of the great warrers. this game is best when there is a delicate balance between netters and warrers. the problem right now is that there aren't enough players for both portions to be happy so the warrers win out since their states take little time and talent. destroying something is always much easier than building it up.

but in the end the game thrives on having great nations and persuasive nation leaders that make playing this game fun whether it is warring or netting. the downfall came when most those leaders preferred to net and just got tired and left the game and no one stepped up in their spot.

[Calvin74]

And all he could muster up where what, 7 failed AR's on your worst state and then he gave up? We burned down LoR's front gates and he still just sat at the entrance throwing pebbles at the crumbled walls...

i don't know this guy but i have to say that is one of the funniest lines i have heard in a long time on these boards

[Lord Burch]

LMFAO wow you're STILL talking in this thread? I thought you got bored with it...lmao