Originally Posted by
Rassputtin
my personal opinion is that desructive ops on someone with 0 spies is not a suicide because of the random factor involved with ops and because having SOME spies is an easy way to prevent it.
Being that most times destructive ops are only done on people in war or when they have 0 spies, having SOME spies will deter anyone from doing destructive ops to you because they don't want to get caught.
You'll notice I made one post under the "Patriot Act" thread. That is that my preference is not admin interferance but code change and that it was good to see a step taken in the suicide prevention direction.
There was a reason I made only one post, and didnt comment on the act at all except i prefered not admin interference............
That reason is because I don't like the patriot act, I prefer code change, and I'll just leave it at that.
All due respect to everyone, and I mean this in the nicest possible way, but there is also a reason my posts and activity has declined to almost nothing.........................
I am in strong disagreance with a large majority of whats happening, whats not happening, whats planned on happening and whats not planned on happening.......... quite frankly i'm disgusted.
I'm borderline on whether or not I'm going to find someone with 0 spies and ram them with destructive ops, just to join the terrorist list on principle.
There is a difference between suicide protection, and enabling lame, stupid **** that is a major turn off to continued patronage of the game, like infantry hording and not having to carry ANY spies.
I'm sorry, but I had to say it.