if only LoR declared war on GRIM like they planned until i talked to Ali, then we could see max *****ing as well
Dak at heart
Wouldn't have happened.
i know wars happen im just upset that my best start and looked like my best finish in my 2-3 years playin was taken from me once again... i have already informed satan(it was his call to kill me from what he has told me) and ali that i will be going after them and most likly will be the one to kill them at least once this set. ohh and to any leaders of nations that are looking to make some forum credits easly get into contact with me i am once again goin to offer bountys for specific states(havnt looked at what states they are yet) but let me know and i will get back with you as soon as possible
Last edited by k959; 01-07-2009 at 18:47.
ehh its my call for that. not one leader has said anything to me about it i just decided to offer them again due to having 2billion sitting in the bank
correction 3 billiion sitting in the bank
Last edited by k959; 01-07-2009 at 19:19.
LoR-66.8 mill net, 107.4 k land, 27 current members, about 15 alive warrriors
vT/Pain-55.1 mill net, 94.7 k land, 18 current members, about 10 alive warriors
Not even, but not too far off.
Anyone that counts net as a measure of equality in war is just friggin beinf rediculous. Everyone knows, even you Cem, that the true measure of being an equal war is the number of potential turns available to the attacking nation and that is not done by NW, that is ppl in the nation, PERIOD!
When you jumped us, with twice the number of members, you had way more turns than we could contend with, so get off it.
isnt it fair to say that member count is just what it is, member count.
the fact that they are inactive is only the fault of the leader right?
so why do inactives alway play a part of the whining that things are unfair. if you have inactive member than whos fault is it? the attacked or the attacker?
the closest you are ever going to get to a fair fight is members vs members...
intent to net or war doesnt really matter because you can allways war or be warred.
inactive doesnt matter because its the leaders fault that they carry active or inactive members.
IMO if the members are the same the war is as close to fair as possible.
im no fan of LOR tactics, but if they declared on two nations that happen to be related in some way instead of one in order to justify "fairness" (no such thing really), than its good in my book.
A good reason is allways a plus in my book, but we all know they dont exist. anymore at least.
I agree 100% with Dogma, potencial turns vs potencial turns is the only possible measure of equality.