Next Set Changes..

[Cemetary]

very good question cem...seems to be unfair if a big nation can destroy a little nation if they did nothing wrong

actually it makes sense.. why protect the minority when the majority r in bigger nations??

there doesnt need to be any protection for them since 90% of the game is ok if that happens

[MarineRecon]

point made

[-Z-]

so if u fail on them and they kill you, that isnt suiciding?

Suicide attacks have no definition at the present time, and there seems to be a deliberate attempt to keep the rules ambiguous.

We can assume these efforts at vaguery by the controlling members of this game are effectually in place to allow the admins (and or other members with influence) to impose their will without reason at any given point. Should something happen that they do not approve of, these new rules will allow them to take action without just cause.

Patriot Act #2 for NW/WoW.

I saw this coming after the original patriot act was essentially revoked. I knew they would not allow control to be out of their hands for too long.

I am interested as to what this will bring.

Z

[-Z-]

actually it makes sense.. why protect the minority when the majority r in bigger nations??

there doesnt need to be any protection for them since 90% of the game is ok if that happens

indeed.

it only makes sense for the admins to follow the will of the old vets,

New players and individual states are not as important as the core group.

Z

[MarineRecon]

to bad they dont have a medal for best suicide in a set we could def have a competition with that hahah

[Calvin74]

indeed.

it only makes sense for the admins to follow the wills of the old vets,

New players and individual states are not as important as the core group.

Z

please take your whining and hypocritical posts somewhere else. this thread and this post are solely meant to announce the changes for next set. it isn't for you three to whine about how you are being mistreated and how everyone is out to get you. if you look at it you three were the suiciders hitting innocent people. you don't get to take the high road after those actions.

[Cemetary]

please take your whining and hypocritical posts somewhere else. this thread and this post are solely meant to announce the changes for next set. it isn't for you three to whine about how you are being mistreated and how everyone is out to get you. if you look at it you three were the suiciders hitting innocent people. you don't get to take the high road after those actions.

hey **** face, im sorry if i asked for clarification on these new changes

you tell me not to suicide, then u make aggressive spy ops legal.. makes no sense

----------------
edit*

also, i have another question, ive AAd before in order to allow an ally to take a top position/nation take a top position, thats suiciding under these conditions right?

[MarineRecon]

according to wut Mr P. said as long as ure helping an ally its fine

[-Z-]

please take your whining and hypocritical posts somewhere else. this thread and this post are solely meant to announce the changes for next set. it isn't for you three to whine about how you are being mistreated and how everyone is out to get you. if you look at it you three were the suiciders hitting innocent people. you don't get to take the high road after those actions.

I am not whining. (You will see this if u read my posts... did u read them?)

I agree with the changes for the most part, I am confused about adding a new aggressive spy opp, while disallowing single man attacks.

It seems to be taking steps in two different directions.

It will be interesting anyway.

I do not think it is wise to change the entire scheme of the game due to the actions of a few people.

But it is good to make small changes.

single man attacking has been a part of this games ever since I started playing almost a decade ago, some people call them suicide attacks.

they are part of the game, always have been, and if they were not part of the game, this game would not be the game it is today (which I still think is a fine game)

Everyone is hung up on these "Suicide attacks" and the term, or idea of it.

I fought with a nation for dozens of sets, I was in different nations, I might one day again go back to leading, or just playing in a nation.

But as I have said many times now. I feel that if a man wants to fight alone for a time, there is nothing wrong with that.

Z

[Calvin74]

hey **** face, im sorry if i asked for clarification on these new changes

you tell me not to suicide, then u make aggressive spy ops legal.. makes no sense

----------------
edit*

also, i have another question, ive AAd before in order to allow an ally to take a top position/nation take a top position, thats suiciding under these conditions right?

yeah i guess if you dec war then you also have to worry about the other side killing your guy

also calling me names isn't really helping things. I personally don't have a problem with you cem. Still kinda like you and enjoyed talking on msn it is mostly Z and marine with their self pitying comments. You did join in and it brought nothing constructive to the table.