how the f would a bomber defend against a bomber? Give the guy some breathing room. He is not going to put out crap.
So many threads have begged for a bomber update and I am sure after extensive research, long thought, and loophole prevention testing Mr. P is going to put out closest to the best product possible.
Honstly I am shocked that people have not been screeming and shouting about the UN idea...and the "donation" situation involved.
The only problem i have with the UN thing is a moral one, not technical. NO MATTER WHAT there is always going to be a nation (or two) that most do not favor. IE, viets, estos, LOR, WLF ect... and I didnt/dont want to see a situation were the UN or community could possibly force out or weaken/single out one particular nation just to burn a witch or two...
BR Sounds nice especially since Cem has been bugging me to use Bombers
just pushing buttons a bit...
being a member of the UN will not give you any more "power" over another nation. it will just give you small benefits. Like being able to receive aid from other UN nations. A UN nation will not be able to run out any other nation at all. They don't have special powers or special jets or higher NW. It's simply an option that nations can join if they choose too. But again like i said it's not a free service. They will be charged for being a member of the UN..
Jets and SAM's defend against the bombers..
hey you... hush up! it was one stupid comma lmao.. dang eyes kept missing it.
"You counted on America to be passive... You counted Wrong!"
not sure if you missed this part of my first post.......
seriously though, i don't want to spend a lot of time answering questions about it yet. Cause as i answer one or two then they just keep growing.. And then when these come out, people will ask the same ones and i'll have to either refer them here or answer them again... All i wanted to do was just let you all know some of the cool things headed our way..
"You counted on America to be passive... You counted Wrong!"