ABT AGAIN!

[ooga booga]

Oogla, you totally missed the point of my post.

If Mr. President wanted to leave this guy at 100 land for the night and expect no one to 'intervene', he should have set up a separate server where only he and this guy played. Instead, this happened in a public game. Where there are probably 100 other people doing their thing. Now he is angry that one out of these 100+ decided to SA this guy at 100 land? Should this be the next rule change?

Rule 152: You are not allowed to kill anyone with SAs if your nation is not at war with the target state's nation.

And I'm a suicider because I killed an inactive with 100 land? How the standards have fallen when you are no longer able to do war attacks outside of war. I do the great -Z- and Marine Recon shame.

And you completely missed the point of my post as well. Not once did I call you a suicider. I said you have the attitude of one. There is a big difference. You are playing the role of "I don't care about other states but myself to have fun and try to spice things up." I know this guy was small meat but you guys are good players that play up top enough to know that it gets annoying when someone starts messing with you for their amusement. That's all I'm saying.

[Mr President]

Oogla, you totally missed the point of my post.

If Mr. President wanted to leave this guy at 100 land for the night and expect no one to 'intervene', he should have set up a separate server where only he and this guy played. Instead, this happened in a public game. Where there are probably 100 other people doing their thing. Now he is angry that one out of these 100+ decided to SA this guy at 100 land? Should this be the next rule change?

Rule 152: You are not allowed to kill anyone with SAs if your nation is not at war with the target state's nation.

And I'm a suicider because I killed an inactive with 100 land? How the standards have fallen when you are no longer able to do war attacks outside of war. I do the great -Z- and Marine Recon shame.

Whoa... Nobody called you a suicider. I called you a Kill stealer

I left him at 102 land cause the chance of him getting SA'd 10 times in a 24hr period is slim.

He isn't an inactive state, he logs on often. He just can't log in on weekends normally which is why I wanted him left alive. I suppose I should have said something about all of this on the forums but I really didn't want to draw any attention to the matter.

I was irritated cause you looked through the scores list, saw him with low land and intentionally killed him with 10 SA's. So what happened here is I spent all the turns doing the work and you swooped in and took the kill. You wouldn't be irritaded over that?

What's done is done and no sense in dwelling over it any longer. It will probably cost me several dozen dounuts to keep him playing the game now..

As for your comment about rule 152, are you kidding me? I mean really come on don't you think the "rule" stuff has been blown way out?

I impose a rule on suiciding and everyone acts like we have all these rules. Other then the basic TOS rules that we have ALWAYS had and now the temp suiciding rule please fill me in on the other 150 rules..

[Max Logan]

I left him at 102 land cause the chance of him getting SA'd 10 times in a 24hr period is slim.

Guess you never expected a Xavior

[Mr President]

guess your right.. Well next time I leave someone at 102 land I'll kill Xavior first

[BeeNo]

He wasn't trying to kill him, he left him at 200 land for a reason. If he was trying to kill him he would have killed him. He has his reasons, and if you don't know than you probably shouldn't have intervened. If you are so curious and have to know it was a friend of his who thought he could take down USA.

What I don't understand is that you two are the first ones to get upset when someone ruins your states when you are playing for top, but when it's a set that you are not fully active or doing well you don't mind being one of those guys that "don't care" and don't mind ruining the set of others. It's all fun and games and then you come on here and find it funny that it aggravates others when you've been in the same spot before and have been frustrated before. I know you do this when you get bored but it comes across a little selfish (suicider attitude). Just my 2 cents on it.

you are severely mistaken if you look at the damage we caused. i'm going to be honest, i've messed around with max's state, or itty's state, or vinnies state, or xav's state or kens state at different points in the game to amuse myself. i know the guys, and i don't actually cause them much damage, i think itty signed onto me failing 50 spy ops on him this month trying to get his intel. i hit max with a few failed attacks, just dinking around, i think i emp'd itty bitty like 20 times one point this month. no damage done at all. is 3 failed attacks and then 3 more failed attacks between 3 guys who have played in the same nations together for years really a problem?

anyways calvin posted on forums about it so i decided he needed 3 SA's as well. it was just coincidence that he had food 800mil food on hand, i didn't even notice it until after the attacks were done. sorry for destroying your food, but i think you guys are making a big deal out of nothing.

[BeeNo]

i find it funny that if we had done the same total attacks (6 attacks on each state) but had ken or vinnie involved there wouldn't even be a conversation right now. damage would of been the same but since we would of used 3 states to do 2 attacks each its suddenly ok.

[Calvin74]

you are severely mistaken if you look at the damage we caused. i'm going to be honest, i've messed around with max's state, or itty's state, or vinnies state, or xav's state or kens state at different points in the game to amuse myself. i know the guys, and i don't actually cause them much damage, i think itty signed onto me failing 50 spy ops on him this month trying to get his intel. i hit max with a few failed attacks, just dinking around, i think i emp'd itty bitty like 20 times one point this month. no damage done at all. is 3 failed attacks and then 3 more failed attacks between 3 guys who have played in the same nations together for years really a problem?

anyways calvin posted on forums about it so i decided he needed 3 SA's as well. it was just coincidence that he had food 800mil food on hand, i didn't even notice it until after the attacks were done. sorry for destroying your food, but i think you guys are making a big deal out of nothing.

see was an apology so hard to come by
had you hit just me i wouldn't have made a post about it. just the obscene number of hits on CR in a 36 hour period warranted some attention. that and pron was whining that everything was boring

[BeeNo]

ahhh did we just kiss and make up?

[Calvin74]

ahhh did we just kiss and make up?

maybe
i have been pretty hard up recently and my sheep are saying no

[ooga booga]

you are severely mistaken if you look at the damage we caused. i'm going to be honest, i've messed around with max's state, or itty's state, or vinnies state, or xav's state or kens state at different points in the game to amuse myself. i know the guys, and i don't actually cause them much damage, i think itty signed onto me failing 50 spy ops on him this month trying to get his intel. i hit max with a few failed attacks, just dinking around, i think i emp'd itty bitty like 20 times one point this month. no damage done at all. is 3 failed attacks and then 3 more failed attacks between 3 guys who have played in the same nations together for years really a problem?

anyways calvin posted on forums about it so i decided he needed 3 SA's as well. it was just coincidence that he had food 800mil food on hand, i didn't even notice it until after the attacks were done. sorry for destroying your food, but i think you guys are making a big deal out of nothing.

Honestly in the long run it's probably not a big deal. I'm not even involved I'm just giving my opinion of an outsider. To me it's always the principal of it. I know you guys were goofing around but it seemed to be at Calvin's expense which he originally didn't appreciate. If people goof around against each other I wouldn't say anything but if someone messes with someone else for fun and the other person isn't finding it fun than I take notice. I know you guys are good guys so I'm not worried about. Just thought that maybe the next time you goof off to make sure you know who you are goofing off isn't going to get all mad you.

P.S. You do realize at some point in the future (like 2 years from now) Tnova will randomly buy 80 million jets at the end of one set and kill you out of the blue for your acts against him this set right?