in another thread i quoted George Washington. its really incredible the amount of insight he had, he was against political parties before political parties existed.
Mr. President makes some good points, it is our responsibility to educate ourselves, and look for our own answers, ultimately we are responsible for electing our own public officials. For too long have i heard people say, "well i'm not voting for him, he's not republican or democrat and has no chance to be elected, that would be a waste of my vote."
here is the link to the united states senate, go ahead and research for yourself who votes for what and how they actually represent you.
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/leg...ative_home.htm
and here is the link to the house of representatives.
http://clerk.house.gov/legislative/legvotes.aspx
also you can quickly just type in your senator or representatives name and go to their website to learn a little more about them. some of them have quick links to show how they have voted on various issues, some do not. just remember it may be a little bias toward them.
Is the american public smart enough to see threw the BS they are fed everyday? some of us are...
i see more eye to eye with democrats than republicans, but really i have found individuals from both parties who i agree with.
what i don't understand is how both parties can't articulate their side and meet somewhere in the middle. were not doin this! we'll never do that!
on a side note i did watch an actual debate on CSPAN featuring the house of representatives on tax reform. one issue that was brought up that received bipartisan support was corporate tax reform. the united states corporate tax rate in 35%, however there are so many tax subsidies in the law that if they eliminated the subsidies they could substantially lower the corporate tax rate and still have enough money left over to knock off some of the national debt.
now what does that mean to me? well i take it some of these subsidies are necessary and needed, but i have not actually had the opportunity to examine corporate tax law. but it seems to me a little disingenuous to say we have a 35% tax rate when he effective tax rate is much lower. basically reform and removal of many of these subsidies could in fact create a more accurate number for us to study.
anyways i've been drinking for more than 12 hours straight at this point so, i'm just going to leave my thoughts there and take up my discussion later.