Originally Posted by
Max Logan
Margus is a great player, there are no questions about that. He could be around at the top 15-20 best there ever was. When you compare the rest of ICN, you compare them to nowdays. I don`t know which WoW period blaa and you were playing, but Margus came to glory at the end of...idk, call it the 'real WoW', doesn`t matter. Point is, yeah, you`re good, decent, but most of you have never experienced a real fight, you`ve never been at war with a couple of hundred states and you never had to worry about being killed of the top until the few last sets. GRIM jus gave you a glimpse of how things were when there were actually people playing and not just using turns. Right now, most people play cuz they`re been at this for years, they don`t really care, nor do they put any effort in it.
Bottom line, don`t think anything you achieve is really inpressive. Sure, maybe Blade is impressed by how 'good' the Sky states are, but, well, as they say - I`ve seen better. It`s like comparing Italy to Roman empire - sure Italy has a lot more money and military power (tanks, jets, ships), but they aren`t a percent of what the Roman empire was.
Sure you might hold the top state record, but that`s just because of the recent updates, if it weren`t for the expanding bonus and the casher tweak, top states would rarely go above 600-700m net. And I`m not even talking about the complete lack of competition...
). And after you get taken down everytime you jump, it gets boring. In my opinion, about 70% of staying at top1 is about luck, because if someone wants to take you down, they can take you down with relative ease. Also, I'd like to know how do you judge how good a player is?
Newsflash - it's a text-based game, so there's a limit of how good you can be, and tbh, that limit isn't that high.
Reply With Quote
