Money Laundering in Nation Wars

[MellonColly]

actually money laundering is concealing the source of ONLY illegally gotten money.

There is nothing being done illegally here.

another definition

The process of taking the proceeds of criminal activity and making them appear legal.

Again...nothing criminal done here. Everything they are doing is well within the rules...

You expanded on the definition there so it fits your need

[Dogma]

I have to agree with Ang on this one. You did steer the poll to basically obtain the answer as you see it to be correct by the wording of your options. Which is exactly why I decided not to vote in it.

Even though he scolded me in a previous post.

[blaa]

I voted that I don't care.

The newbies shouldn't be able to win after they have learned that pure strategy works the best.

[Divine Intervention]

tbf i dont really have an issue with this (not least of all because I believe I had such help when I won in my 5 man tag...but even then the person who was doing it finished top3 and because I've helped others do this too). its commendable that they repeatedly find players who are willing to put enough time in to contribute to the nation but not too much that it makes it a real loss for them to do this. fact is if you want to win a set you have to be organized and plan things. you can't just wing it randomly doing **** grabs OOP and then hoping your little first 5 day jump is going to get you the win. bottom line is - instead of criticizing them each nation should easily be able to have atleast 1-2 players who are semi active and there to help the tag.

[blaa]

I think devil should be banned from using turns. He clearly doesnt want to win the set, but he still uses turns and creates NA for LoR!!!
ICN will have 5% tax next set, everybody come ICN!

[BladeEWG]

Since there is nothing being done that any other tag or player can't do I can't see how it is illegal.
There are some very skilled players in this game(not me) that know what to do and do so.
if its the same capability that everyone else has then its just basically down to skill level and co ordination.
the Estonians are very good at it, just as they were at Sky before

Talking with blaa and margus just wants me to move to a closer time zone

[Dogma]

tbf i dont really have an issue with this (not least of all because I believe I had such help when I won in my 5 man tag...but even then the person who was doing it finished top3 and because I've helped others do this too). its commendable that they repeatedly find players who are willing to put enough time in to contribute to the nation but not too much that it makes it a real loss for them to do this. fact is if you want to win a set you have to be organized and plan things. you can't just wing it randomly doing **** grabs OOP and then hoping your little first 5 day jump is going to get you the win. bottom line is - instead of criticizing them each nation should easily be able to have atleast 1-2 players who are semi active and there to help the tag.

Since there is nothing being done that any other tag or player can't do I can't see how it is illegal.
There are some very skilled players in this game(not me) that know what to do and do so.
if its the same capability that everyone else has then its just basically down to skill level and co ordination.
the Estonians are very good at it, just as they were at Sky before

Talking with blaa and margus just wants me to move to a closer time zone

I have to agree with these posts as well. Everyone knows it takes a nation to win a set, otherwise you would see untagged states winning. I see no issue with what they are doing as for a long time now I have not worried about my own finish but the nation and members. I am a supporter of the nation and my turns help whoever is on top from my nation. This game is set up to emulate an economy and is interactive in a way that what you do either helps or hinders your nation. Selling all your military while being high in land actually hurts your ability to help because if you are caught low you get raped for land, ain't that right 33?

If you want to use this as a reason to war a certain nation, then war them. But just like GRIM coming in here trying to change the mechanics of the game simply because they don't like how someone plays is wrong, saying that someone sacrificing their own state to benefit their nation is wrong.

Sorry, I can't agree with the premise that it is feeding, not to mention it was determined long ago that feeding in that way is not against TOS.