View Poll Results: Is Money Laundering Acceptable?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes - Maybe we should all do it

    5 35.71%
  • No - It is an abuse of the system

    8 57.14%
  • What do I care about community, fairness, and new members?

    1 7.14%
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Money Laundering in Nation Wars

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,855

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divine Intervention View Post
    considering you waste a lot of WLF NA with your grabs, I think this decision just made WLF more competitive Netting wise xD
    Well they would be without alot of land and NW, but perhaps.

    Z




    [WLF] = the greatest nation ever to exisit, in any game, in any universe, of all time, period.


  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    192

    Default

    the only real issue i have with this is that it benefits the larger tags, who in my eyes allready are way to dominant on the server.

    even if a 5 man tag uses four of its players to do the same, the 15 man tag will be able to outproduce and resell them by putting up 4-6 of their own while 2 focus on top ranking and the other 7 handle the competition. Is that illegal? No, is it undesirable in a well populated server (500+)? No, is it desirable in a server with 70 active players at most? yes.

    i realize Ang/Lor is currently running top with a 5 man tag, but without the wars we all know the odds would be stacked well against them....

    just my 2 cents
    __________________________________________________
    Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war!

    You have received a warning at Nation-Wars Community Forum.

    Reason:
    -------
    Insulted Other Member(s)

    You deserve that infraction for being mean to Maggio.. I hope you have learned your lesson. Now go to your room and don't come out till you are ready to say you're sorry.

    bad bad boy!!


    morituri te salutant

    EURO Retals

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scav View Post
    the only real issue i have with this is that it benefits the larger tags, who in my eyes allready are way to dominant on the server.

    even if a 5 man tag uses four of its players to do the same, the 15 man tag will be able to outproduce and resell them by putting up 4-6 of their own while 2 focus on top ranking and the other 7 handle the competition. Is that illegal? No, is it undesirable in a well populated server (500+)? No, is it desirable in a server with 70 active players at most? yes.

    i realize Ang/Lor is currently running top with a 5 man tag, but without the wars we all know the odds would be stacked well against them....

    just my 2 cents
    thing is that 15-20man nation won't be able to put up for 5-7 people to help out the tag. Only Sky has such dedication and even then they usually have probs 3. When I won my set I had a 5-6man tag with 1-2 people helping NA and we were competing against top netters in 2 v.big nations (15+ ) who had really good NA + tech. was hard but doable.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  4. #34

    Default

    if im smart with my grabs the NA loss is minimal...most of the time you can attack too without the NA and that really helps

    another draw back to the big nations is people are constantly hitting all their guys...which means more NA lost, also most of their guys are probably using NA as well...So like DI said...its very hard, but doable.

    Yes without the wars tho...i wouldnt be where i am.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MellonColly View Post
    if im smart with my grabs the NA loss is minimal...most of the time you can attack too without the NA and that really helps

    another draw back to the big nations is people are constantly hitting all their guys...which means more NA lost, also most of their guys are probably using NA as well...So like DI said...its very hard, but doable.

    Yes without the wars tho...i wouldnt be where i am.
    yep. smart NA use is an important thing. in such situations if you can get away without sending NA (which as top1 state you should be able to) do it. and try and have the whole nation follow similar principles. in part thats why i like small tags more....much easier to have everyone running efficiently for the good of everyone. with bigger tags I remember as soon as 1 person jumps and starts to net then everyone wants to and hits NA bad

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

Similar Threads

  1. nation-wars
    By Eminet in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-14-2014, 21:37
  2. Nation-Wars
    By Confederation in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-27-2013, 23:24
  3. New to Nation Wars
    By kevingp in forum Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-05-2013, 19:03
  4. Nation wars is the...
    By Mrmcjoey15 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-29-2008, 09:44

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •