Such a shame that this crime goes by without any penalty
New game policy?
Such a shame that this crime goes by without any penalty
New game policy?
Did I whine last set when MADE came after ICN 'for fun' and took my state down whereas I had enough stock to jump TOP 3? I decided to play peacefully this set and forget last set's misfortune because I don't have too much spare time on hands right now. But even if blaa's only reason for striking you was revenge for last set, then it's still justified to provide you with MADE's medication. I would've done the same given time. For every action there will be a reaction. Stop whining and be a man for once
Declaring on ICN is obviously not a suicide as its nation vs nation.
Being able to jump to top3 and having the top state neither is the same to me.
And you mixing in here doesnt make it any better, as its not your concern.
Oh dear, blaa must've really hurt your feelings...
What makes a one man nation less of a nation than a nation of 9?Declaring on ICN is obviously not a suicide as its nation vs nation.
What is and what isn't my concern is actually my concern not yours.And you mixing in here doesnt make it any better, as its not your concern.
If you're going to declare war on a nation, you should only do so when you have a realistic prospect of killing at least one state. A single state has no hope of doing this to even a halfway decent noob (6-7k or more land) running a mixed strat. Against a vet? impossible unless they (and their nation) are massively inactive. These days it takes at least two states to kill one. So yes, by any reasonable definition what blaa did was a suicide even if it doesn't technically count as one in the written rules. And what Made did last set was a proper war even if you dislike their reasons or lack of them.
I am a part of a huuuuuuuge nation. I mean huge.
I just wasn't in the same basket.
"Keeping eggs in different baskets"
Incorrect. If one plays out his turns well, then 1vs1 is possible, even against a veteran, Anton should know betterThese days it takes at least two states to kill one.
Had I not 25 SA'd MADE's party boy last set, then I could give you an example now of how it can be done, but until something like that comes up again, you'll need to figure it out yourself, how this is possible.
I had nothing against what MADE did last set, it was great fun, although it didn't last too long because of blaa bailing outSo yes, by any reasonable definition what blaa did was a suicide even if it doesn't technically count as one in the written rules. And what Made did last set was a proper war even if you dislike their reasons or lack of them.
But on the same reasoning I have nothing against what blaa did. Go out grab a beer and enjoy life, this here is only a game...
PS. Regarding last matter, huge respect towards Anton, the mighty retard(it takes one to recognise another)
Last edited by ukurasmus; 07-06-2012 at 08:54.
1 vs 1 is possible in GA vs Indy target if you have 300 turns. And you dont need to AA to break. And you have loads of Inf so you dont lose much readiness. And BRs vs small states. And one shouldn't start sentences with and . Either way Im quite a risk averse warrer so I like the BR method most of the time, sometimes not even realizing the inf break is small
Last edited by Divine Intervention; 07-06-2012 at 09:15.
Hehe, it's nice to be a warrer or a warrior, but it's even better to be an aware general
EDIT: Not that I am one