Page 24 of 31 FirstFirst ... 14171819202122232425262728293031 LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 309

Thread: eleet vs DEAD

  1. #231
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Latvia
    Posts
    3,237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ukurasmus View Post
    Uhm, weren't you the one who striked us first? I believe this is a fact, everything else is just assumptions with only emotional proof.
    I`m pretty sure eleet started this first. but your facts must be more right then the game GE.
    CW, TWC/PX, E

    USA(x), Deli, DOOM, GRIM/DEAD(x), EURO, SLOB(x), LoR, ABT(x), CR(x), RE

  2. #232
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Logan View Post
    I`m pretty sure eleet started this first. but your facts must be more right then the game GE.
    think hes talking about the set Made declared war on ICN + UB (whilst still being at war with USA at that point, i think? maybe not though). Either way, we didnt declare on 1 smaller tag at a time, like eleet did with WLF this set :-/.

    p.s. ****, wanted to get the kill on Heyne with my 150 OOP turn restart, but left him on 8 land with no turns left :'(
    Last edited by Divine Intervention; 08-27-2012 at 08:12.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  3. #233
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Latvia
    Posts
    3,237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divine Intervention View Post
    think hes talking about the set Made declared war on ICN + UB (whilst still being at war with USA at that point, i think? maybe not though). Either way, we didnt declare on 1 smaller tag at a time, like eleet did with WLF this set :-/.

    p.s. ****, wanted to get the kill on Heyne with my 150 OOP turn restart, but left him on 8 land with no turns left :'(
    wtf do those sets have to do with this set?
    CW, TWC/PX, E

    USA(x), Deli, DOOM, GRIM/DEAD(x), EURO, SLOB(x), LoR, ABT(x), CR(x), RE

  4. #234
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Logan View Post
    wtf do those sets have to do with this set?
    i dont know! but its their reason. as i said, i dont mind getting killed, i helped DEAD out and I stayed there to soak up any attacks that others might wanted to throw at them later on in set.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  5. #235
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    901

    Default

    he meant that after our war with dead and wlf, u guys (anton) joined in, therefor techinally got a FS.

  6. #236
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Logan View Post
    I`m pretty sure eleet started this first. but your facts must be more right then the game GE.
    Oh Maxie, my dear, you clearly didn't read/think enough again. My personal goal was to give a cold wind breeze to the tag jumpers. Unfortunately, some of them still remain to be taught. No hard feelings towards DEAD and their restarts

  7. #237
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Latvia
    Posts
    3,237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ukurasmus View Post
    Oh Maxie, my dear, you clearly didn't read/think enough again. My personal goal was to give a cold wind breeze to the tag jumpers. Unfortunately, some of them still remain to be taught. No hard feelings towards DEAD and their restarts
    I`m pretty sure you said they started and gave it as a fact. Whereby the real truth is eleet did the first declaration and FS of the set, hence, started 'it'. Whatever happened afterwards is meaningless to your statement and hereby, does not contribute to the statement that DEAD started 'it'. 'It' was started when eleet FSed DEAD earlier in the set. That`s a fact.

    You can call me Maxie, dear, sonny, it still does not change the fact you were wrong. Again.
    CW, TWC/PX, E

    USA(x), Deli, DOOM, GRIM/DEAD(x), EURO, SLOB(x), LoR, ABT(x), CR(x), RE

  8. #238
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Logan View Post
    I`m pretty sure you said they started and gave it as a fact. Whereby the real truth is eleet did the first declaration and FS of the set, hence, started 'it'. Whatever happened afterwards is meaningless to your statement and hereby, does not contribute to the statement that DEAD started 'it'. 'It' was started when eleet FSed DEAD earlier in the set. That`s a fact.

    You can call me Maxie, dear, sonny, it still does not change the fact you were wrong. Again.
    You do know that you're becoming annoying, my little troll

    Too bad, unfortunately we thought we were in peace with you after the FS and therefore started our world dominance plan, but you decided to start messing around again.
    See the AGAIN above?
    Last edited by ukurasmus; 08-27-2012 at 13:19. Reason: added the troll :D

  9. #239
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    #awkwardmomentwheneleethavemoreFSandstillgetownedi nCS.

    sorry not sober, just happy to see more kills ;-)

    YOU might have more NW killed, but honestly, after this round, no one is going to have a higher opinion of your warring skills. therehave been sets, where estos have owned in warring, but this wasnt oneof them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  10. #240
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    (-5:00)
    Posts
    3,084

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divine Intervention View Post
    #awkwardmomentwheneleethavemoreFSandstillgetownedi nCS.

    sorry not sober, just happy to see more kills ;-)

    YOU might have more NW killed, but honestly, after this round, no one is going to have a higher opinion of your warring skills. therehave been sets, where estos have owned in warring, but this wasnt oneof them.
    two cheap shots in the same set from eleet only to end up back firering to an extent on the heels of blaa suiciding last set. , what a joke of a leader and player. #nohonor

    you might as well go back to suiciding next set blaa because you only put other members in danger when they tag up with you.

Similar Threads

  1. [eleet] vs [WES]
    By BeeNo in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-27-2016, 21:06
  2. NIP vs ELEET
    By kenshin44 in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-24-2014, 15:16
  3. eleet vs ELE
    By MAGGIO in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-01-2013, 09:30
  4. eleet vs DEAD for Sept.
    By MAGGIO in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 09-13-2012, 11:09
  5. Eleet vs TB4W
    By Benjidatramp in forum Redemption Wars & Relations
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-12-2012, 19:09

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •