think hes talking about the set Made declared war on ICN + UB (whilst still being at war with USA at that point, i think? maybe not though). Either way, we didnt declare on 1 smaller tag at a time, like eleet did with WLF this set :-/.
p.s. ****, wanted to get the kill on Heyne with my 150 OOP turn restart, but left him on 8 land with no turns left :'(
Last edited by Divine Intervention; 08-27-2012 at 08:12.
he meant that after our war with dead and wlf, u guys (anton) joined in, therefor techinally got a FS.
I`m pretty sure you said they started and gave it as a fact. Whereby the real truth is eleet did the first declaration and FS of the set, hence, started 'it'. Whatever happened afterwards is meaningless to your statement and hereby, does not contribute to the statement that DEAD started 'it'. 'It' was started when eleet FSed DEAD earlier in the set. That`s a fact.
You can call me Maxie, dear, sonny, it still does not change the fact you were wrong. Again.
CW, TWC/PX, E
USA(x), Deli, DOOM, GRIM/DEAD(x), EURO, SLOB(x), LoR, ABT(x), CR(x), RE
Last edited by ukurasmus; 08-27-2012 at 13:19. Reason: added the troll :D
#awkwardmomentwheneleethavemoreFSandstillgetownedi nCS.
sorry not sober, just happy to see more kills ;-)
YOU might have more NW killed, but honestly, after this round, no one is going to have a higher opinion of your warring skills. therehave been sets, where estos have owned in warring, but this wasnt oneof them.
two cheap shots in the same set from eleet only to end up back firering to an extent on the heels of blaa suiciding last set. , what a joke of a leader and player. #nohonor
you might as well go back to suiciding next set blaa because you only put other members in danger when they tag up with you.