Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: The Empire Strikes Back - UK most powerful nation on Earth

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scav View Post
    personally i'd vote for norway with there 720 billion $ oil fund that they can spend should they choose to do so ;-) now thats a nice little nest egg for country to have... especially considering they only have 6 million people... $120k surplus per capita stored for bad times... mind you this is not part of their regular budget which is also running a surplus...
    actually there is only 5 017 518 of them but yeah the oil fund is worth around 700 billion us.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Producing 2.1M barrels of oil a day kinda helps to balance the budget ;-)

    Budget surplus (+):

    15% of GDP (2011 est.)
    __________________________________________________
    Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war!

    You have received a warning at Nation-Wars Community Forum.

    Reason:
    -------
    Insulted Other Member(s)

    You deserve that infraction for being mean to Maggio.. I hope you have learned your lesson. Now go to your room and don't come out till you are ready to say you're sorry.

    bad bad boy!!


    morituri te salutant

    EURO Retals

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Norway is a socialist leaning country, right? No doubt they'll be in the shitter before this century (maybe even half? ) Is up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divine Intervention View Post
    Norway is a socialist leaning country, right? No doubt they'll be in the shitter before this century (maybe even half? ) Is up.
    Have you been reading that work of fiction the Daily Mail again?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Will View Post
    Have you been reading that work of fiction the Daily Mail again?
    nope, ive simply begun seeing 30-40 percent + of my salary disappear to fund god awful government programmes. If I was in charge I'd vastly reduce spending and use that to fund tax breaks for the lower tax brackets (and not as we did by scaling back additional tax rate brackets). Currently studying tax for my job doesn't help with the attitude. All the unnecessary complexity and admin! thieving innocent hard workers at every corner!

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divine Intervention View Post
    nope, ive simply begun seeing 30-40 percent + of my salary disappear to fund god awful government programmes. If I was in charge I'd vastly reduce spending and use that to fund tax breaks for the lower tax brackets (and not as we did by scaling back additional tax rate brackets). Currently studying tax for my job doesn't help with the attitude. All the unnecessary complexity and admin! thieving innocent hard workers at every corner!
    If you reduced spending that much you would end up with riots every week. London would be a warzone. Which government programs are particularly bad?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Will View Post
    If you reduced spending that much you would end up with riots every week. London would be a warzone. Which government programs are particularly bad?
    exactly. a culture of entitlement and assumption that the government will provide. changes would have to be made gradually obviously. but even then its so engrained one has to wonder, is there any hope for many of these people? So often Im going on my way to work / in shop / walking on streets and there are just so many people who I have no idea how they would survive in a professional, salary earning environment.

    hmm things that are particularly bad? how about the Department for International Development. Cut the whole lot out. I dont buy this whole "Britain Brand Building" bullshit. Nor do I believe that people should be forced to help starving kids etc across the world. Why not increase Gift Aid benefits or something if the goverment wants people to help the 3rd world out?

    Spending on military projects that are none of our business - Libya conflict, Syrian conflict support....if were gonna be helping out terrorists, why not start helping out Hamas against Israel too?

    EU? I dont really care for all the "omg our trade will suffer with EU" argument...or the "we can work in EU now too and get equal benefits..."....Personally, for me, the possibility of staying as an independent country without having power centralised to a massive extent in a federalist state (with no real representation or oversight and a loss of national sovereignty) outweighs all possible economic benefits (and with the massive unnecessary spending and corruption at EU, one could argue about which way things weighed in terms of benefits). Not to mention theres a whole other world out there with whom we can trade with and with whom we have much closer ties to on so many levels if we wanted to start integrating.

    Im sure there are many things that need to be changed economically in this country, but the fact that a social-cultural change needs to happen is even more obvious. We have too many people who's net contribution to society im just unsure about. Although I guess you could argue that they do bring in valuable revenue through purchase of cigarettes & alchohol on which they pay tax etc etc

    Btw Will, have you read the book "Jennifer Government"? Highly recommend it. Its somewhat a dig against anti-big government people, but the irony is, i actually quite liked the vision it proposed as opposed to what big government might entail in a dystopian future
    Last edited by Divine Intervention; 11-21-2012 at 18:08.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divine Intervention View Post
    exactly. a culture of entitlement and assumption that the government will provide. changes would have to be made gradually obviously. but even then its so engrained one has to wonder, is there any hope for many of these people? So often Im going on my way to work / in shop / walking on streets and there are just so many people who I have no idea how they would survive in a professional, salary earning environment.

    hmm things that are particularly bad? how about the Department for International Development. Cut the whole lot out. I dont buy this whole "Britain Brand Building" bullshit. Nor do I believe that people should be forced to help starving kids etc across the world. Why not increase Gift Aid benefits or something if the goverment wants people to help the 3rd world out?

    Spending on military projects that are none of our business - Libya conflict, Syrian conflict support....if were gonna be helping out terrorists, why not start helping out Hamas against Israel too?

    EU? I dont really care for all the "omg our trade will suffer with EU" argument...or the "we can work in EU now too and get equal benefits..."....Personally, for me, the possibility of staying as an independent country without having power centralised to a massive extent in a federalist state (with no real representation or oversight and a loss of national sovereignty) outweighs all possible economic benefits (and with the massive unnecessary spending and corruption at EU, one could argue about which way things weighed in terms of benefits). Not to mention theres a whole other world out there with whom we can trade with and with whom we have much closer ties to on so many levels if we wanted to start integrating.

    Im sure there are many things that need to be changed economically in this country, but the fact that a social-cultural change needs to happen is even more obvious. We have too many people who's net contribution to society im just unsure about. Although I guess you could argue that they do bring in valuable revenue through purchase of cigarettes & alchohol on which they pay tax etc etc

    Btw Will, have you read the book "Jennifer Government"? Highly recommend it. Its somewhat a dig against anti-big government people, but the irony is, i actually quite liked the vision it proposed as opposed to what big government might entail in a dystopian future
    I've heard of it but not read it.

    Can't say I disagree with you much on where to cut spending, though I'm more pro-EU.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Will View Post
    I've heard of it but not read it.

    Can't say I disagree with you much on where to cut spending, though I'm more pro-EU.
    Oh, and I'm also anti-green energy subsidising. Its all a big scam IMO and a way to rinse the tax payers and funnel money into the hands of vested interests. This is coming from some one who spent several months working for a green-tech start up. I have no problems with supporting entrepreneurship and enterprise, but supporting an industry on the tax payers back seems a little too left wing for me.

    Will, I'm surprised that you're not more anti-EU considering that I remember you as being a British patriot? Do you want to see UK become some little bit of a massive state? Sure we might be able to "compete" more with China and USA as a whole economy...but at what expense? To have our money being spent on some unaccountable project in some back water part of europe? To have our voice have such an inconsequential voice in the greater manner of things? How can such different people be represented by one unanimous body? Obviously were suffering massive sociol engineering to make us some homogeneous group and have us lose our sense of identity, but until that fated day comes....should we not be fighting for whats in our best intersets?

    btw, Croydon by-elections happening atm, funny thing...my mum wanted to vote National Front . Had to explain why its not really a good idea xD

    Quote Originally Posted by Cemetary View Post
    Pretty sure if Anton wanted to he could have a 15+ person nation every set of decently experienced players.. hell id probably join him every set if he asked jsut because i know that their wont be a bunch of tards in the nation with me

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divine Intervention View Post
    Oh, and I'm also anti-green energy subsidising. Its all a big scam IMO and a way to rinse the tax payers and funnel money into the hands of vested interests. This is coming from some one who spent several months working for a green-tech start up. I have no problems with supporting entrepreneurship and enterprise, but supporting an industry on the tax payers back seems a little too left wing for me.

    Will, I'm surprised that you're not more anti-EU considering that I remember you as being a British patriot? Do you want to see UK become some little bit of a massive state? Sure we might be able to "compete" more with China and USA as a whole economy...but at what expense? To have our money being spent on some unaccountable project in some back water part of europe? To have our voice have such an inconsequential voice in the greater manner of things? How can such different people be represented by one unanimous body? Obviously were suffering massive sociol engineering to make us some homogeneous group and have us lose our sense of identity, but until that fated day comes....should we not be fighting for whats in our best intersets?

    btw, Croydon by-elections happening atm, funny thing...my mum wanted to vote National Front . Had to explain why its not really a good idea xD
    Tell her to spoil the ballot Did you vote for a police commisioner?

    Patriotism is a waste of time unless we somehow bring back the empire, and there's more chance of Poland conquering Russia than that.

    As to the EU, I agree there's plenty wrong with it, but the UK is too small to be credible standing on our own, and the other option is to become 51st state. Sod that, better the French and Germans than the madness that runs rampant in the US. (no offense to the yanks here btw) We either become:

    1) Insignificant Island

    2) Major player in EU

    3) Officialy a US colony (arguable we're already one unofficialy)

Similar Threads

  1. I'm back and looking for a nation...
    By Top12Gun in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-27-2011, 07:55
  2. Earth 2025
    By GorGo in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-20-2010, 10:47
  3. earth shutting down...
    By northbabylon in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-07-2009, 10:20

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •