I knew ud say something pointless as alwaysOriginally Posted by FrogBu
I say we all don't allow Pasha to get over 1m NW ever for a reset and call that a victory.
VP of Security
I knew ud say something pointless as alwaysI say we all don't allow Pasha to get over 1m NW ever for a reset and call that a victory.
VP of Operations
Wait... What? You got electric? Mine has no wheels. I just have a bag chair...Don't worry Dogma, you and I will sit in our electric wheelchairs and watch the show
President
hahahaha Well the President should have it easier
"You counted on America to be passive... You counted Wrong!"
Vice President of Forum Affairs
my hard earned taxes should not go towards an electric wheelchair for the president...
Nations
[usa] x 48[wlf] x 8 [want] x 3 [tng] x 1 [NS] x 8 [px] x
1 [HuuF] x 1
VP of Security
to get back to original topic.
I like Blaa proposal, netting and warring will allow a more stable economy for the rest of the players.
The whole thing of highest NW state killed, is however not too interesting. Why should the killing state get reward for the work of a nation?
As for the reward thing, well me personally I dont want prem
However, an introduction of Nation medals, for highest NW killed and etc should be considered. If not now then at some other point.
From what I understand, we basically War-net...and winner will be a nation with top state having higher NW than the other nations top state?
how do you decide when to finish warring?
VP of Security
open for discussion.
How about a war that lasts 7 days? Simple and not too much time will be required.
seemed like a pretty short discussion
Command Sergeant
We're in.
How about starting from third week (we agree on a date/time when we declare, should be suitable for both of us) and then 7 days from that we see a winner.
Private
This is probably the politest war ever.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
