Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: "Unwritten rules"

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Missionary Guest

    Default "Unwritten rules"

    This seems to be lost now with alot of people taking the piss. Seems to happen every set to me and I see it happening to others all the time.

    Just to be clear,
    No more than 2 SA's in 36 hours.
    No more than 1 SA in the top3 in 36 hours.
    - failed attacks count as one. You might not have got the land but I lost the military.
    No destructive spy ops - NONE.

    The return attacks will be massively over the top from now on until people seem to get the rules. One is currently pending.

    Have a good day.

  2. #2

    Default

    With the limited targets top 1 gets I will be double tapping all except 2nd place. If we get closer to 30 active players I can change
    You cashed 1 turns. This generated a total of $1.284.622.556 from which $550.552.524 was generated as a cashing bonus.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,813

    Default

    I retaliated a triple today too. a few AAs and I was nice with only 1 SA.
    Nations
    [usa] x 48[wlf] x 8 [want] x 3 [tng] x 1 [NS] x 8 [px] x
    1 [HuuF] x 1

  4. #4

    Default

    Stupid "rules" like this is one of the reasons there are only 15 active players left. My first hit on you was a defeat, followed by 2 successful SAs. These "rules" made sense when there were 1,000 active players.

    I wasn't planning on warring my first set back but I have no problem ruining the month for you. It's immature to send me private messages in-game and then complain on the forum as well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    ESTONIA!
    Posts
    196

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ploppy View Post
    Stupid "rules" like this is one of the reasons there are only 15 active players left. My first hit on you was a defeat, followed by 2 successful SAs. These "rules" made sense when there were 1,000 active players.

    I wasn't planning on warring my first set back but I have no problem ruining the month for you. It's immature to send me private messages in-game and then complain on the forum as well.
    I agree, these rules are pointless.
    [4:06:20] Pavel:
    Stepps : Always a good idea to try and get atleast 1 Estonian in your nation instead of what we got

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ploppy View Post
    Stupid "rules" like this is one of the reasons there are only 15 active players left. My first hit on you was a defeat, followed by 2 successful SAs. These "rules" made sense when there were 1,000 active players.

    I wasn't planning on warring my first set back but I have no problem ruining the month for you. It's immature to send me private messages in-game and then complain on the forum as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by zaxZ View Post
    I agree, these rules are pointless.
    Whether the rules are pointless or not, it's good to see some friction in the forums again I remember when little conflicts like this turned the game into a global war.

    I personally don't care if we have the unwritten rules or not. In fact, I think I will make it a "hard coded" rule that my state can't be grabbed for land (jk)

    "You counted on America to be passive... You counted Wrong!"

  7. #7

    Default

    And Missionary, I know AAs won?t kill your state - that?s not my objective. I?m going to make the game unplayable for you the rest of the month or until you apologize. Every turn I take will be a war or spy attack on you. Plenty of time left in the month for a restart that can ruin the end of the set for you as well.

    PS I?m quarantined working from home so plenty of time to keep this up.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,813

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr President View Post
    Whether the rules are pointless or not, it's good to see some friction in the forums again I remember when little conflicts like this turned the game into a global war.

    I personally don't care if we have the unwritten rules or not. In fact, I think I will make it a "hard coded" rule that my state can't be grabbed for land (jk)
    forum trash talk would too. Pres you're a poop head.

    *declares war*
    Nations
    [usa] x 48[wlf] x 8 [want] x 3 [tng] x 1 [NS] x 8 [px] x
    1 [HuuF] x 1

  9. #9
    Missionary Guest

    Default

    Don't believe I was complaining here, just stating my current attack policy. Maybe if you read the message and replied I wouldn't have attacked you haha.

    James has won the set, not much point in playing for 1st runner up out of 15 people. You haven't ruined my set, you've made it worth playing, so I thank you.

    And just so you know, 3 attacks that include a failed attack is worse than 3 successful attacks. I still lost 3-4mill infantry each attack, including the defeat. So I lost 3-4mill infantry and gained no gb.

    3 attacks at the same time also, more often than not, results in knowone attacking me because I'm a poor grab. So in 36 hours I will be back to 0gb for you to triple me again. I think not.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,813

    Default

    just fyi, I am okay with you tripling me if you spread the attacks out by 10 hours each
    Nations
    [usa] x 48[wlf] x 8 [want] x 3 [tng] x 1 [NS] x 8 [px] x
    1 [HuuF] x 1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •