Is it ok to AA somebody with a higher networth then take land?
I mean what good are ships if we can't use them?
Is it ok to AA somebody with a higher networth then take land?
I mean what good are ships if we can't use them?
It works as a strategy but you and your nation would probably get killed by the nation you do it to because they won't like it.
ya aa + sa = bad things
The game would be better if we could use AA to help with land grabs.
I'm not talking about AA to 0 but just a couple, few times, in order to secure a land grab.
You can do it. It's not against any game rules. The problem is the consequences. You have to consider the result of using a war attack, in this case an AA that will kill millions of units, to lower readiness enough so that you can attack again kill more units and steal land.
Obviously its a fine thing to do if you're prepared to accept the retaliation.
I'd take that beer and talk your ear off, just like I type your eyes out
VAL~SH~ELE~GRIM
Total Sets = 10 ~ Suicided On = 2 ~Netting Sets = 2 ~ Warring Sets = 8
Hey Rass, remember our AAs on [RO] when we played in Valhala with GK?
Originally Posted by Tnova- Lost and Desolated -
WoW | [CW][E][ELE][FW][TNR][Dak][FED][SSC][xPJx][HuuF][LoR][TWC][PX][Horde][EURO][Royals][TE][USA][ExELDx][SH][VAL]
NW | [USA][GRIM][DEAD][ABT][SLOB][AIUR][LoR][TG][xELDx][TEEF][UFS][bro][FEDx][XF][ICN][LoUB][TE][GIAA][Hades][Pasta][GGG]
AAs just get bad press.
Its one of those gentleman rules that gets enforced by the gentlemen at the top.
[GRIM]x16[THIK]x2[SC][LOR]
YOU BRING THE RIFLES ILL SUPPLY THE NAPALMYou should fear my inability to finish number one!I will be pissing in Cheerios and Pooping in Oatmeal again next set!!
***Puffs out chest, cracks knuckles, bombers locked and loaded!