WW3or4

[Will]

for a succesful invasion to occur the British navy, airforce, coastal defences. submarine force and the mine fields all had to be destroyed. not to mention Nazi German didn't have the scale to facilite a mass invasion that would have been needed to complete their objective. i doubt the 120k or w/e max they could have transported through a combination of amphibious assaults and air landings would have been suffiicient (let alone possible considering what would have been needed to be done prior in order to achieve this).

No, all that would be needed was air superiority over the Channel and parts of southern England, plus an open sea corridor. At most, Germany would have been delayed for several months, perhaps a year before sufficient transport caty could be built to establish a beachhead. Once a decent German force had landed, there is no way they would have been stopped on the ground. 500k troops would have been sufficient to defeat the British forces on home soil, since a lot of heavy equipment had been lost at dunkirk in 1940 meaning German tanks would be almost impossible to stop.

[Divine Intervention]

you are just using impossible scenarious to win your argument. let me try. yeah and whilst Hitler was busy sending 500k troops to conquer Britian, USSR would have created a 10million man army (with nukes being in development already) and steamrolled everything to Gibrlatar

[Will]

you are just using impossible scenarious to win your argument. let me try. yeah and whilst Hitler was busy sending 500k troops to conquer Britian, USSR would have created a 10million man army (with nukes being in development already) and steamrolled everything to Gibrlatar

What is impossible about delaying Barbarossa for a year?

[Morph]

What is impossible about delaying Barbarossa for a year?

nothing...besides the fact that they would face a larger number of T34's and K1 tanks. Which they at that time didnt have anything against. Well except the 88's

[Will]

nothing...besides the fact that they would face a larger number of T34's and K1 tanks. Which they at that time didnt have anything against. Well except the 88's

The Russians didn't have the capability to launch a long term offensive in 1942. It wasn't until lend lease got properly underway that the red army had the motorisation to pull it off. Besides, Stalin was afraid of Germany and wouldn't have attacked lightly.

[Morph]

The Russians didn't have the capability to launch a long term offensive in 1942. It wasn't until lend lease got properly underway that the red army had the motorisation to pull it off. Besides, Stalin was afraid of Germany and wouldn't have attacked lightly.

im not talking about invasion...the USSR wasnt ready to do anything like that...not in 1941 or in 1942.

[Will]

Oh, well, in that case Hitler would have had ample time to build up, with the added benefit of captured British Industry/Workers.

[Divine Intervention]

you forgot, USSR managed to develop nucleur weapons in the meanwhile you of all people should know that British people wouldn't have just calmly, cooly and entirely without incident just drop their pants and use the British industry to help the Nazi war machine...

[Will]

you forgot, USSR managed to develop nucleur weapons in the meanwhile

Of course, because Russia never does anything wrong, the Poles at Katyn were killed by the Germans, and Britain was secretly planning to shell leningrad from it's Finnish bases which is why the USSR had to invade there.

[Divine Intervention]

Of course, because Russia never does anything wrong, the Poles at Katyn were killed by the Germans, and Britain was secretly planning to shell leningrad from it's Finnish bases which is why the USSR had to invade there.

1) they were
2) the British maybe weren't but the Finns were offered a very very good exchange of land all along peninsula in exchange for moving the border next to Leningrad so that they wouldn't be able to shell our city from within their borders....for some strange reason they rejected....hmmm wonder why that unpopulated land was so precious to them...oh but of course the Soviet invasion was because of our imperialistic ambitions. which is why of course we didnt attack along our extremely big and from Finlands point of view - undefended border and instead attacked headlong into their most fortified positions

anyway, stop getting off topic with youre hate mongering. i have proven my point about Georgia, so all you n00bs can get back to your little theories about WW3.